Welsch Matthew D, Mih Alexander D, Reiter Brock D, Merrell Gregory A
Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Mar;43(3):290.e1-290.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
To determine the anatomic feasibility of transferring the biceps brachii tendon into either the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) or flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), determine the excursion imparted to EDC and FDP tendons after transfer, and compare the work capacity of the cadaver biceps to previously published data on the biceps as well as the recipient muscles by calculating the physiologic cross-sectional area (PCSA).
Four fresh-frozen cadaver shoulder-elbow-wrist specimens were used to measure tendon excursion that can be obtained with transfer of the distal biceps tendon into either the EDC or FDP. Two cadavers had distal biceps-to-EDC transfer performed, and the other 2 had distal biceps-to-FDP performed. Passive ranging of each elbow from flexion to extension and active loading at 90° of elbow flexion were then performed on each specimen to determine tendon excursion. An analysis of the PCSA of the biceps muscle was performed on each specimen.
Distal biceps-to-EDC transfer resulted in an average of 24 mm of tendon excursion with passive loading, and 24 mm of tendon excursion with active loading. Distal biceps-to-FDP transfer resulted in an average of 24 mm of tendon excursion with passive loading, and 24 mm of tendon excursion with active loading. The average PCSA was 3.6 cm.
Transfer of the distal biceps tendon into the EDC or FDP is anatomically feasible and provides roughly 24 mm of tendon excursion to the tendon units. The PCSA in the specimens used is slightly lower than other published data; it closely approximates the PCSA of the EDC, but is only half of the PCSA of the FDP in previously published data.
The findings suggest potentially novel transfer options for restoring finger flexion and extension in patients lacking FDP or EDC function.
确定将肱二头肌肌腱转移至指总伸肌(EDC)或指深屈肌(FDP)的解剖学可行性,确定转移后赋予EDC和FDP肌腱的移动距离,并通过计算生理横截面积(PCSA)比较尸体肱二头肌与先前发表的关于肱二头肌以及受区肌肉的工作能力数据。
使用4个新鲜冷冻的尸体肩 - 肘 - 腕标本测量将肱二头肌远端肌腱转移至EDC或FDP时可获得的肌腱移动距离。2具尸体进行了肱二头肌远端至EDC的转移,另外2具进行了肱二头肌远端至FDP的转移。然后对每个标本进行从屈曲到伸展的被动活动度测量以及在肘关节屈曲90°时的主动加载,以确定肌腱移动距离。对每个标本的肱二头肌进行PCSA分析。
肱二头肌远端至EDC转移在被动加载时平均肌腱移动距离为24 mm,主动加载时为24 mm。肱二头肌远端至FDP转移在被动加载时平均肌腱移动距离为24 mm,主动加载时为24 mm。平均PCSA为3.6平方厘米。
将肱二头肌远端肌腱转移至EDC或FDP在解剖学上是可行的,并为肌腱单位提供约24 mm的肌腱移动距离。所用标本中的PCSA略低于其他已发表的数据;它与EDC的PCSA相近,但仅为先前发表数据中FDP的PCSA的一半。
这些发现提示了在缺乏FDP或EDC功能的患者中恢复手指屈伸的潜在新转移选择。