Suppr超能文献

探索高价值初级保健的属性。

Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care.

机构信息

Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):529-534. doi: 10.1370/afm.2153.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Medicare's merit-based incentive payment system and narrowing of physician networks by health insurers will stoke clinicians' and policy makers' interest in care delivery attributes associated with value as defined by payers.

METHODS

To help define these attributes, we analyzed 2009 to 2011 commercial health insurance claims data for more than 40 million preferred provider organization patients attributed to over 53,000 primary care practice sites. We identified sites ranking favorably on both quality and low total annual per capita health care spending ("high-value") and sites ranking near the median ("average-value"). Sites were selected for qualitative assessment from 64 high-value sites and 102 average-value sites with more than 1 primary care physician who delivered adult primary care and provided services to enough enrollees to permit meaningful spending and quality ranking. Purposeful sampling ensured regional diversity. Physicians experienced in primary care assessment and blinded to site rankings visited 12 high-value sites and 4 average-value sites to identify tangible attributes of care delivery that could plausibly explain a high ranking on value.

RESULTS

Thirteen attributes of care delivery distinguished sites in the high-value cohort. Six attributes attained statistical significance: decision support for evidence-based medicine, risk-stratified care management, careful selection of specialists, coordination of care, standing orders and protocols, and balanced physician compensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of care delivery attributes that distinguish their high-value peers may help physicians respond successfully to incentives from Medicare and private payers to lower annual health care spending and improve quality of care.

摘要

目的

医疗保险的基于绩效的奖励支付系统和健康保险公司缩小医生网络,将激发临床医生和政策制定者对与支付方定义的价值相关的护理提供属性的兴趣。

方法

为了帮助定义这些属性,我们分析了 2009 年至 2011 年超过 4000 万首选提供商组织患者的商业健康保险索赔数据,这些患者归因于超过 53000 个初级保健实践站点。我们确定了在质量和低人均年度医疗保健支出方面排名均较高(“高价值”)和排名接近中位数(“平均价值”)的站点。从 64 个高价值站点和 102 个平均价值站点中选择站点进行定性评估,这些站点有超过 1 名提供成人初级保健并为足够的参保人提供服务以允许有意义的支出和质量排名的初级保健医生。有目的的抽样确保了区域多样性。具有初级保健评估经验且对站点排名一无所知的医生访问了 12 个高价值站点和 4 个平均价值站点,以确定可能合理解释高价值排名的护理提供的有形属性。

结果

高价值队列中的护理提供有 13 个属性。六个属性具有统计学意义:循证医学决策支持、风险分层护理管理、仔细选择专科医生、护理协调、常规医嘱和方案以及平衡的医生薪酬。

结论

了解区分其高价值同行的护理提供属性可能有助于医生成功应对医疗保险和私人支付方的激励措施,以降低年度医疗保健支出并提高护理质量。

相似文献

1
Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):529-534. doi: 10.1370/afm.2153.
3
Report on financing the new model of family medicine.
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Dec 2;2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-21. doi: 10.1370/afm.237.
5
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610.
6
Exploring Care Attributes of Nephrologists Ranking Favorably on Measures of Value.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2464-2472. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019030219. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
Critical Lessons From High-Value Oncology Practices.
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;4(2):164-171. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3803.
8
Michigan's fee-for-value physician incentive program reduces spending and improves quality in primary care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):645-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0426.
9
For Medicare's New Approach To Physician Payment, Big Questions Remain.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1643-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0939.
10
Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2345-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1414953. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of community health workers: the fourth stage.
Front Public Health. 2023 May 30;11:1209673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1209673. eCollection 2023.
2
Team Relationships and Performance: Evidence from Healthcare Referral Networks.
Manage Sci. 2022 May;68(5):3175-3973. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4091. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
Benchmark Method for Cost Computations Across Health Care Systems: Cost of Care per Patient per Day in Breast Cancer Care.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1403-e1412. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00462. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Understanding how health systems facilitate primary care redesign.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1144-1154. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13576.
5
Exploring Care Attributes of Nephrologists Ranking Favorably on Measures of Value.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2464-2472. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019030219. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
6
Assessing quality improvement capacity in primary care practices.
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 25;20(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1000-1.

本文引用的文献

2
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
4
In search of joy in practice: a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices.
Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;11(3):272-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1531.
5
When does adoption of health information technology by physician practices lead to use by physicians within the practice?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e26-32. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001271. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
6
Physician cost profiling--reliability and risk of misclassification.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):1014-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0906323.
7
American medical home runs.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1317-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1317.
8
Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care.
Implement Sci. 2009 May 8;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-25.
9
Slowing the growth of health care costs--lessons from regional variation.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26;360(9):849-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0809794.
10
The triple aim: care, health, and cost.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验