Suppr超能文献

每日行为报告卡对 ADHD 儿童的有效性:一项荟萃分析。

The Effectiveness of Daily Behavior Report Cards for Children With ADHD: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Atten Disord. 2020 Oct;24(12):1623-1636. doi: 10.1177/1087054717734646. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined group-design studies investigating the effectiveness of Daily Behavior Report Cards (DBRC) as a school-based intervention to manage the classroom behavior of students with ADHD. A search of three article databases (PsycINFO, ERIC and Medline) identified seven group design evaluations of DBRC interventions. This meta-analysis included a total of 272 participants, with an average age of 7.9 years old. Three of the studies compared a control group to a treatment group with randomized group assignment, one study compared a control group to three treatment groups, two studies compared pre-and post-treatment scores in the same group, and one study compared pre-and post-treatment results of two intervention groups without random assignment. Dependent measures for these studies were teacher ratings (n = 5) and systematic direct observation of student academic and social behaviour (n = 2). Standardized mean differences () were calculated to obtain a pooled effect size using fixed effects. DBRCs were associated with reductions teacher-rated ADHD symptoms, with a of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.12-0.60, z=2.93, p ≤ .005) with low heterogeneity (Q-value: 2.40, I = 0.00). This result excluded two studies that used observational coding instead of standardized tests to evaluate the effects of the intervention. A moderator analysis indicated that the effect size for systematic direct observation was large ( 1.05[95% CI: 0.66-1.44, z=5.25, p ≤ .00]), with very high heterogeneity (Q-value: 46.34, I: 93.53). A second moderator analysis found differences in the effects of DBRCs for comorbid externalizing symptoms with an overall effect size of 0.34 (95%CI: -0.04-0.72, =1.76 =0.08) with high heterogeneity (Q-value: 3.98, I: 74.85). DBRCs effectively reduce the frequency and severity of ADHD symptoms in classroom settings. Additionally, they have a significant effect on co-occuring externalizing behaviors. It appears that systematic direct observation may be a more sensitive measure of treatment effects compared to teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms.

摘要

这项荟萃分析研究了以群体设计探讨每日行为报告卡(DBRC)作为一种学校干预措施来管理 ADHD 学生课堂行为的有效性的研究。通过对三个文献数据库(PsycINFO、ERIC 和 Medline)的搜索,确定了七项关于 DBRC 干预的群组设计评估。这项荟萃分析共纳入了 272 名参与者,平均年龄为 7.9 岁。其中三项研究将对照组与随机分组的治疗组进行了比较,一项研究将对照组与三个治疗组进行了比较,两项研究比较了同一组的治疗前后得分,一项研究比较了两个干预组的治疗前后结果,而没有进行随机分配。这些研究的因变量是教师评定(n=5)和学生学业和社会行为的系统直接观察(n=2)。使用固定效应计算标准化均数差()以获得合并效应量。DBRCs 与减少教师评定的 ADHD 症状有关,效应量为 0.36(95%CI:0.12-0.60,z=2.93,p≤0.005),异质性低(Q 值:2.40,I=0.00)。这一结果排除了两项使用观察性编码而非标准化测试来评估干预效果的研究。一项调节分析表明,系统直接观察的效应量较大(1.05[95%CI:0.66-1.44,z=5.25,p≤0.00]),异质性非常高(Q 值:46.34,I:93.53)。第二项调节分析发现 DBRC 对共患的外化症状的影响存在差异,总体效应量为 0.34(95%CI:-0.04-0.72,=1.76=0.08),异质性高(Q 值:3.98,I:74.85)。DBRCs 可有效降低课堂环境中 ADHD 症状的频率和严重程度。此外,它们对外化行为的共病有显著影响。与 ADHD 症状的教师评定相比,系统直接观察似乎是一种更敏感的治疗效果衡量指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验