Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Fam Process. 2018 Dec;57(4):927-946. doi: 10.1111/famp.12331. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
This study reports on the development and validation of the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network coparenting perceptions scale for nonresident fathers. Although other measures of coparenting have been developed, this is the first measure developed specifically for low-income, nonresident fathers. Focus groups were conducted to determine various aspects of coparenting. Based on this, a scale was created and administered to 542 nonresident fathers. Participants also responded to items used to examine convergent and predictive validity (i.e., parental responsibility, contact with the mother, father self-efficacy and satisfaction, child behavior problems, and contact and engagement with the child). Factor analyses and reliability tests revealed three distinct and reliable perceived coparenting factors: undermining, alliance, and gatekeeping. Validity tests suggest substantial overlap between the undermining and alliance factors, though undermining was uniquely related to child behavior problems. The alliance and gatekeeping factors showed strong convergent validity and evidence for predictive validity. Taken together, results suggest this relatively short measure (11 items) taps into three coparenting dimensions significantly predictive of aspects of individual and family life.
本研究报告了非居住父亲的父性研究与实践网络共同养育感知量表的开发和验证。尽管已经开发出其他共同养育措施,但这是第一个专门为低收入非居住父亲开发的措施。通过焦点小组确定了共同养育的各个方面。在此基础上,创建了一个量表并对 542 名非居住父亲进行了测试。参与者还回答了用于检验聚合和预测效度的项目(即父母责任、与母亲的接触、父亲自我效能和满意度、儿童行为问题以及与儿童的接触和参与)。因素分析和可靠性测试显示了三个不同且可靠的感知共同养育因素:破坏、联盟和把关。效度检验表明,破坏和联盟因素之间存在显著重叠,尽管破坏因素与儿童行为问题存在独特关联。联盟和把关因素显示出较强的聚合效度和预测效度的证据。综上所述,研究结果表明,这种相对简短的测量方法(11 个项目)能够深入了解三个对个人和家庭生活各个方面具有显著预测性的共同养育维度。