• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol.肺癌筛查计算机定制决策支持工具的开发与可用性测试:研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 16;6(11):e225. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8694.
2
Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.计算机定制的肺癌筛查决策支持工具:基于社区的试点随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 3;22(11):e17050. doi: 10.2196/17050.
3
Development and validation of a personalized, web-based decision aid for lung cancer screening using mixed methods: a study protocol.使用混合方法开发并验证基于网络的个性化肺癌筛查决策辅助工具:一项研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Dec 19;3(4):e78. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4039.
4
A Veteran-Centric Web-Based Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening: Usability Analysis.一种以退伍军人为中心的基于网络的肺癌筛查决策辅助工具:可用性分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 8;6(4):e29039. doi: 10.2196/29039.
5
An Analytical Mobile App for Shared Decision Making About Prenatal Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.一款用于产前筛查共同决策的分析型移动应用程序:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Oct 8;8(10):e13321. doi: 10.2196/13321.
6
Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.患者和临床医生对早期肺癌筛查计划中共同决策的看法:一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4350-9. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
The impact of computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and perceived usability and acceptability on the efficacy of a decision support tool for colorectal cancer screening.计算机自我效能感、计算机焦虑感、可感知可用性和可接受性对结直肠癌筛查决策支持工具效果的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):407-12. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000225. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
8
Implementation of a Web-Based Tool for Shared Decision-making in Lung Cancer Screening: Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Evaluation.基于网络的肺癌筛查共享决策工具的实施:混合方法质量改进评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 1;9(2):e32399. doi: 10.2196/32399.
9
Development and testing of "Is Lung Cancer Screening for You?" A computer-based decision aid.“肺癌筛查适合你吗?”一种基于计算机的决策辅助工具的开发和测试。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Mar;34(3):287-294. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01650-2. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
10
Ask the parents: Testing the acceptability and usability of a hypospadias decision aid.询问家长:测试尿道下裂决策辅助工具的可接受性和可用性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Apr;18(2):170.e1-170.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
EmpowerHer-a smoke-free future: a feasibility study examining the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally concordant tobacco treatment intervention in African American women.“赋予她力量——无烟未来”:一项关于非裔美国女性中文化协调一致的烟草治疗干预措施的可行性和可接受性的可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 May 31;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01664-y.
2
Supporting community translation of lung cancer screening: A web-based decision aid to support informed decision making.支持肺癌筛查的社区翻译:一种基于网络的决策辅助工具,以支持明智的决策。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae073.
3
Effective Communication About Lung Cancer Screening Without Iatrogenic Stigma: A Brief Report Case Study Using the Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool of .关于肺癌筛查的有效沟通且无医源性污名:一项简短报告案例研究,使用了……的肺癌污名沟通评估工具
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Oct 13;4(11):100585. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100585. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Leveraging social media to increase lung cancer screening awareness, knowledge and uptake among high-risk populations (The INSPIRE-Lung Study): study protocol of design and methods of a community-based randomized controlled trial.利用社交媒体提高高危人群对肺癌筛查的认识、知识和参与度(INSPIRE-Lung 研究):一项基于社区的随机对照试验的设计和方法研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15857-8.
5
Leveraging social media to increase lung cancer screening awareness, knowledge and uptake among high-risk populations (The INSPIRE-Lung Study): Study protocol of design and methods of a community-based randomized controlled trial.利用社交媒体提高高危人群对肺癌筛查的认识、知识水平及参与度(INSPIRE-Lung研究):一项基于社区的随机对照试验的设计与方法研究方案
Res Sq. 2023 May 4:rs.3.rs-2846041. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2846041/v1.
6
Effects of a smartphone application named "Shared Decision Making Assistant" for informed patients with primary liver cancer in decision-making in China: a quasi-experimental study.中文译文:在中国,一款名为“共享决策助手”的智能手机应用程序对原发性肝癌知情患者决策的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 31;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01883-w.
7
A Veteran-Centric Web-Based Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening: Usability Analysis.一种以退伍军人为中心的基于网络的肺癌筛查决策辅助工具:可用性分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 8;6(4):e29039. doi: 10.2196/29039.
8
Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members.携手提高结直肠癌筛查率:社区咨询委员会成员的观点。
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):930-938. doi: 10.1177/0193945921993174. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
9
Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.计算机定制的肺癌筛查决策支持工具:基于社区的试点随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 3;22(11):e17050. doi: 10.2196/17050.
10
Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.解决肺癌筛查资格和医疗保健获取方面的差异。美国胸科学会官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):e95-e112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3053ST.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
2
Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.肺癌筛查参与度:构建一个指导研究的概念模型
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2016 Nov 1;30(4):333-352. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.30.4.333.
3
A qualitative study exploring why individuals opt out of lung cancer screening.一项探索个体选择不参加肺癌筛查原因的定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2017 Apr 1;34(2):239-244. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw146.
4
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales.肺癌筛查健康信念量表的编制与心理测量学评估
Cancer Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;40(3):237-244. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000386.
5
Patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening pre- and post-guidelines: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).患者与医疗服务提供者在肺癌筛查指南前后的讨论:健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1772-1777. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 May 17.
6
Lung cancer screening: what do long-term smokers know and believe?肺癌筛查:长期吸烟者了解并相信什么?
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/hex.12433. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
Development and validation of a personalized, web-based decision aid for lung cancer screening using mixed methods: a study protocol.使用混合方法开发并验证基于网络的个性化肺癌筛查决策辅助工具:一项研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Dec 19;3(4):e78. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4039.
8
Feasibility of a patient decision aid about lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.一种关于低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的患者决策辅助工具的可行性。
Prev Med. 2014 May;62:60-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
9
Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):330-8. doi: 10.7326/M13-2771.
10
Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process.迈向患者决策辅助工具认证的最低标准:一种改进的德尔菲共识过程。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13501721. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

肺癌筛查计算机定制决策支持工具的开发与可用性测试:研究方案

Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol.

作者信息

Carter-Harris Lisa, Comer Robert Skipworth, Goyal Anurag, Vode Emilee Christine, Hanna Nasser, Ceppa DuyKhanh, Rawl Susan M

机构信息

Science of Nursing Care Department, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 16;6(11):e225. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8694.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.8694
PMID:29146565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5709657/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Awareness of lung cancer screening remains low in the screening-eligible population, and when patients visit their clinician never having heard of lung cancer screening, engaging in shared decision making to arrive at an informed decision can be a challenge. Therefore, methods to effectively support both patients and clinicians to engage in these important discussions are essential. To facilitate shared decision making about lung cancer screening, effective methods to prepare patients to have these important discussions with their clinician are needed.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to develop a computer-tailored decision support tool that meets the certification criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument version 4.0 that will support shared decision making in lung cancer screening decisions.

METHODS

Using a 3-phase process, we will develop and test a prototype of a computer-tailored decision support tool in a sample of lung cancer screening-eligible individuals. In phase I, we assembled a community advisory board comprising 10 screening-eligible individuals to develop the prototype. In phase II, we recruited a sample of 13 screening-eligible individuals to test the prototype for usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. In phase III, we are conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 60 screening-eligible participants who have never been screened for lung cancer. Outcomes tested include lung cancer and screening knowledge, lung cancer screening health beliefs (perceived risk, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy), perception of being prepared to engage in a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, occurrence of a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, and stage of adoption for lung cancer screening.

RESULTS

Phases I and II are complete. Phase III is underway. As of July 15, 2017, 60 participants have been enrolled into the study, and have completed the baseline survey, intervention, and first follow-up survey. We expect to have results by December 31, 2017 and to have data analysis completed by March 1, 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from usability testing indicate that the computer-tailored decision support tool is easy to use, is helpful, and provides a satisfactory experience for the user. At the conclusion of phase III (pilot RCT), we will have preliminary effect sizes to inform a future fully powered RCT on changes in (1) knowledge about lung cancer and screening, (2) perceived risk of lung cancer, (3) perceived benefits of lung cancer screening, (4) perceived barriers to lung cancer screening, (5) self-efficacy for lung cancer screening, and (6) perceptions of being adequately prepared to engage in a discussion with their clinician about lung cancer screening.

摘要

背景

在符合筛查条件的人群中,肺癌筛查的知晓率仍然很低,当患者就诊时从未听说过肺癌筛查,进行共同决策以做出明智的决定可能是一项挑战。因此,有效支持患者和临床医生参与这些重要讨论的方法至关重要。为了促进肺癌筛查的共同决策,需要有效的方法让患者为与临床医生进行这些重要讨论做好准备。

目的

我们的目标是开发一种符合国际患者决策辅助标准工具第4.0版认证标准的计算机定制决策支持工具,以支持肺癌筛查决策中的共同决策。

方法

我们将通过一个三阶段的过程,在符合肺癌筛查条件的个体样本中开发和测试计算机定制决策支持工具的原型。在第一阶段,我们组建了一个由10名符合筛查条件的个体组成的社区咨询委员会来开发原型。在第二阶段,我们招募了13名符合筛查条件的个体样本,以测试原型的可用性、可接受性和满意度。在第三阶段,我们正在对60名从未接受过肺癌筛查的符合筛查条件的参与者进行一项试点随机对照试验(RCT)。测试的结果包括肺癌和筛查知识、肺癌筛查健康信念(感知风险、感知益处、感知障碍和自我效能)、对准备好与临床医生就肺癌筛查进行讨论的认知、关于肺癌筛查的患者与临床医生讨论的发生情况以及肺癌筛查的采用阶段。

结果

第一阶段和第二阶段已经完成。第三阶段正在进行中。截至2017年7月15日,已有60名参与者纳入研究,并完成了基线调查、干预和首次随访调查。我们预计在2017年12月31日前获得结果,并在2018年3月1日前完成数据分析。

结论

可用性测试的结果表明,计算机定制决策支持工具易于使用、有帮助,并且为用户提供了令人满意的体验。在第三阶段(试点RCT)结束时,我们将获得初步效应大小,为未来一项关于以下方面变化的全面RCT提供信息:(1)肺癌和筛查知识;(2)肺癌的感知风险;(3)肺癌筛查的感知益处;(4)肺癌筛查的感知障碍;(5)肺癌筛查的自我效能;(6)对准备好与临床医生就肺癌筛查进行讨论的认知。