Suppr超能文献

与 100U/mL 德谷胰岛素相比,1 型糖尿病患者每天接受 0.4U/kg 甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 治疗,其 24 小时药效动力学波动更小,药代动力学更平稳。

Morning administration of 0.4U/kg/day insulin glargine 300U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-hour pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100U/mL in type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

AMCR Institute, 625 West Citracado Parkway Suite 112, Escondido, California 92025, USA.

University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab. 2018 Feb;44(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

Abstract

AIM

To compare steady state pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of insulin glargine 300U/mL (Gla-300) with insulin degludec 100U/mL (Deg-100) in people with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

This single-centre, randomized, double-blind crossover euglycaemic clamp study included two parallel cohorts with fixed once-daily morning dose regimens. For both insulins participants received 0.4 (n=24) or 0.6U/kg/day (n=24), before breakfast, for 8 days prior to the clamp. The main endpoint was within-day variability (fluctuation) of the smoothed glucose infusion rate (GIR) over 24 hours (GIR-smFL).

RESULTS

Gla-300 provided 20% less fluctuation of steady state glucose infusion rate profiles than Deg-100 over 24 hours at 0.4U/kg/day (GIR-smFL treatment ratio 0.80 [90% confidence interval: 0.66 to 0.96], P=0.047), while at the dose of 0.6U/kg/day the difference between insulins was not statistically significant (treatment ratio 0.96 [0.83 to 1.11], P=0.603). Serum insulin concentrations appeared more evenly distributed with both dose levels of Gla-300 versus the same doses of Deg-100, as assessed by relative 6-hour fractions of the area under the curve within 24 hours. Both insulins provided exposure and activity until 30 hours (end of clamp).

CONCLUSION

Gla-300 provides less fluctuating steady state pharmacodynamic profiles (i.e. lower within-day variability) and more evenly distributed pharmacokinetic profiles, compared with Deg-100 in a once-daily morning dosing regimen of 0.4U/kg/day.

摘要

目的

比较每日一次清晨剂量方案下,1 型糖尿病患者中胰岛素 glargine 300U/mL(Gla-300)和胰岛素 degludec 100U/mL(Deg-100)的稳态药效学和药代动力学特征。

方法

这项单中心、随机、双盲交叉血糖钳夹研究包括两个平行队列,采用固定的每日一次清晨剂量方案。对于两种胰岛素,参与者在进行血糖钳夹前 8 天,每天早餐前接受 0.4(n=24)或 0.6U/kg/天(n=24)的剂量。主要终点是 24 小时内平滑葡萄糖输注率(GIR)的日内变异性(波动)(GIR-smFL)。

结果

在 0.4U/kg/天的剂量下,Gla-300 与 Deg-100 相比,24 小时内稳态葡萄糖输注率曲线的波动幅度降低了 20%(GIR-smFL 治疗比值 0.80 [90%置信区间:0.66 至 0.96],P=0.047),而在 0.6U/kg/天的剂量下,两种胰岛素之间的差异无统计学意义(治疗比值 0.96 [0.83 至 1.11],P=0.603)。与相同剂量的 Deg-100 相比,两种剂量水平的 Gla-300 似乎使血清胰岛素浓度的分布更加均匀,这可以通过 24 小时内相对 6 小时 AUC 分数来评估。两种胰岛素的暴露量和活性均持续至 30 小时(血糖钳夹结束)。

结论

与每日一次清晨剂量方案下的 0.4U/kg/天剂量的 Deg-100 相比,Gla-300 提供了波动更小的稳态药效学特征(即日内变异性更低)和更均匀分布的药代动力学特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验