Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Jan;24(1):40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
An early switch from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy is useful for reducing the duration of the hospitalization in adult patients with community acquired-pneumonia, whereas the efficacy of switch therapy for pediatric patients with community acquired (CA)-lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is uncertain. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of switch therapy for LRTI in patients with severe motor intellectual disabilities (SMID). This retrospective study was performed on 92 patients with SMID who were admitted to the Department of Pediatrics at the Hospital of University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2017 for the suspicion of bacterial LRTI and were initially treated with an intravenous antimicrobial agent. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with switch therapy (Switch therapy group) and conventional intravenous antimicrobial therapy (No switch therapy group). Thirteen and 79 in patients with SMID belonged to Switch thrapy group and No switch therapy group, respectively. Length of hospital stay in Switch therapy group was significantly shorter than that in No switch therapy group (P = 0.002). In the patients undergoing switch therapy, there was no patient who required re-treatment and/or re-hospitalization. Switch therapy for LRTI was useful for the reduction of length of hospital stay without increasing risk of re-treatment and re-hospitalization in patients with SMID.
对于社区获得性肺炎的成年患者,早期将静脉内抗菌治疗转换为口服抗菌治疗有助于缩短住院时间,而对于社区获得性(CA)下呼吸道感染(LRTI)的儿科患者,转换治疗的疗效尚不确定。本研究旨在探讨转换治疗在严重运动智力障碍(SMID)患者 LRTI 中的疗效。本回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间因疑似细菌性 LRTI 而在日本九州大学医院儿科住院的 92 例 SMID 患者,这些患者最初接受静脉内抗菌药物治疗。比较了有转换治疗(转换治疗组)和无转换治疗(无转换治疗组)的患者的临床结局。13 例和 79 例 SMID 患者分别属于转换治疗组和无转换治疗组。转换治疗组的住院时间明显短于无转换治疗组(P=0.002)。在接受转换治疗的患者中,没有需要重新治疗和/或再次住院的患者。对于 SMID 患者,转换治疗 LRTI 可缩短住院时间,且不会增加重新治疗和再次住院的风险。