Nové-Josserand L, Clavert P
Ramsay-Générale de santé, hôpital privé Jean-Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, 24, avenue Paul-Santy, 69008 Lyon, France.
Service de chirurgie du membre supérieur, CCOM, CHRU de Strasbourg, avenue Baumann, 67400 Illkirch, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Feb;104(1S):S129-S135. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
Glenoid exposure is agreed to be a difficult step, but is also a key step in total shoulder arthroplasty, both anatomic and reverse. It conditions unhindered use of the ancillary instrumentation and thus correct glenoid component positioning. The main stages comprise arthrotomy, by opening the rotator cuff, humeral head cut, and inferior glenohumeral release, enabling shifting of the humerus and good exposure of the glenoid cavity. The two main approaches are deltopectoral and anterosuperior transdeltoid. Using the deltopectoral approach, arthrotomy is performed through the subscapularis muscle, by various techniques. This approach enables extensive inferior glenohumeral release and thus an approach to the inferior apex of the glenoid cavity, which is a key area for glenoid implant positioning. The main drawbacks are postoperative shoulder instability and limited access to the posterior part of the glenoid in case of significant retroversion. Moreover, subscapularis healing is uncertain, which can impair the clinical outcomes, with risk of glenoid component loosening. Advantages, on the other hand, include the fact that it can be implemented in all cases, even the most difficult ones, and that the deltoid muscle is respected. The transdeltoid approach has the advantage of being simple, providing direct exposure of the glenoid cavity through a rotator cuff tear after passing through the deltoid. It is therefore especially indicated for reverse prosthesis in case of rotator cuff tear, and in traumatology. However, the approach to the inferior part of the glenoid cavity can be restricted, with insufficient exposure and a risk of glenoid component malpositioning (superior tilt). The preoperative assessment is essential, to detect at-risk situations such as severe stiffness and anticipate difficulties in glenoid exposure.
肩胛盂暴露被认为是一个困难的步骤,但也是全肩关节置换术(无论是解剖型还是反置型)中的关键步骤。它为辅助器械的无障碍使用创造条件,从而确保肩胛盂假体的正确定位。主要阶段包括通过切开肩袖进行关节切开术、肱骨头截骨以及下盂肱关节松解,以使肱骨移位并充分暴露肩胛盂腔。两种主要的入路是三角肌胸大肌入路和前上经三角肌入路。采用三角肌胸大肌入路时,可通过多种技术经肩胛下肌进行关节切开术。该入路能够广泛松解下盂肱关节,从而接近肩胛盂腔的下顶点,这是肩胛盂假体定位的关键区域。主要缺点是术后肩关节不稳定,以及在存在明显后倾的情况下,进入肩胛盂后部的途径有限。此外,肩胛下肌的愈合情况不确定,这可能会影响临床效果,并存在肩胛盂假体松动的风险。另一方面,其优点包括在所有情况下(即使是最困难的情况)都可实施,并且能保留三角肌。经三角肌入路的优点是操作简单,通过三角肌后经肩袖撕裂可直接暴露肩胛盂腔。因此,在肩袖撕裂的情况下,尤其适用于反置假体,以及创伤学领域。然而,该入路对肩胛盂腔下部的暴露可能受限,存在暴露不充分和肩胛盂假体位置不当(向上倾斜)的风险。术前评估至关重要,以检测如严重僵硬等高危情况,并预测肩胛盂暴露的困难。