Tieu Jennifer D, Schmidt Sarah A, Miller Jamie L, Kupiec Katherine E, Skrepnek Grant H, Liu Connie, Smith Winter J
1 Pharmacy Department, Mercy Hospital, Oklahoma City, USA.
2 Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;25(3):520-528. doi: 10.1177/1078155217740945. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Clostridium difficile infection treatment guidelines exist for immunocompetent patients; however, there is a paucity of data evaluating clinical outcomes and time to C. difficile-associated diarrhea resolution in neutropenic patients.
To assess clinical outcomes in neutropenic patients treated with metronidazole, oral vancomycin, the combination of metronidazole plus oral vancomycin, and switch of metronidazole to oral vancomycin.
This retrospective, observational cohort study assessed adult neutropenic inpatients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea treated with metronidazole, oral vancomycin, combination (metronidazole and oral vancomycin), or switch therapy (metronidazole to oral vancomycin). The primary outcome was time to diarrhea resolution based on treatment regimen. Secondary outcomes included C. difficile-associated diarrhea resolution of diarrhea by day 14, recurrence, and occurrence of major complications.
Overall, 44 patients met full inclusion criteria (52.2% metronidazole monotherapy, 22.7% combination, and 25.0% switch therapy). Two patients on oral vancomycin monotherapy were excluded due to insufficient sample size. Overall time to C. difficile-associated diarrhea resolution was 9.1 ± 10.7 days. The Cox regression results suggested both switch and combination therapy were associated with 65.5% (p = 0.002) and 65.9% (p = 0.046) longer time to C. difficile-associated diarrhea resolution compared to metronidazole monotherapy, respectively. An increasing absolute neutrophil count was associated with an increase in C. difficile-associated diarrhea resolution (p = 0.007).
Switch or combination therapy was associated with a prolonged time to C. difficile-associated diarrhea resolution. The decision to use switch or combination therapy may represent a surrogate marker for more severe disease and need for therapy escalation. It is unknown if initial therapy with oral vancomycin would provide better outcomes as this could not be assessed.
免疫功能正常的患者有艰难梭菌感染治疗指南;然而,评估中性粒细胞减少患者的临床结局以及艰难梭菌相关性腹泻缓解时间的数据较少。
评估接受甲硝唑、口服万古霉素、甲硝唑联合口服万古霉素以及甲硝唑换用口服万古霉素治疗的中性粒细胞减少患者的临床结局。
这项回顾性观察队列研究评估了接受甲硝唑、口服万古霉素、联合治疗(甲硝唑和口服万古霉素)或换药治疗(甲硝唑换用口服万古霉素)的成年中性粒细胞减少的艰难梭菌相关性腹泻住院患者。主要结局是基于治疗方案的腹泻缓解时间。次要结局包括第14天时艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的缓解情况、复发以及主要并发症的发生情况。
总体而言,44例患者符合全部纳入标准(52.2%为甲硝唑单药治疗,22.7%为联合治疗,25.0%为换药治疗)。2例口服万古霉素单药治疗的患者因样本量不足被排除。艰难梭菌相关性腹泻总体缓解时间为9.1±10.7天。Cox回归结果表明,与甲硝唑单药治疗相比,换药治疗和联合治疗分别使艰难梭菌相关性腹泻缓解时间延长65.5%(p=0.002)和65.9%(p=0.046)。绝对中性粒细胞计数增加与艰难梭菌相关性腹泻缓解增加相关(p=0.007)。
换药治疗或联合治疗与艰难梭菌相关性腹泻缓解时间延长有关。使用换药治疗或联合治疗的决定可能代表疾病更严重以及需要升级治疗的替代指标。由于无法评估,初始使用口服万古霉素治疗是否会带来更好的结局尚不清楚。