Yang Chunliang, Sun Bukuan, Shanks David R
Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Apr;46(3):384-397. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0772-6.
Judgments about future memory performance (metamemory judgments) are known to be susceptible to illusions and bias. Here we asked whether metamemory judgments are affected, like many other forms of judgment, by numerical anchors. Experiment 1 confirmed previous research showing an effect of informative anchors (e.g., past peer performance) on metamemory monitoring. In four further experiments, we then explored the effects of uninformative anchors. All of the experiments obtained significant anchoring effects on metamemory monitoring; in contrast, the anchors had no effect on recall itself. We also explored the anchoring effect on metamemory control (restudy choices) in Experiment 4. The results suggested that anchors can affect metamemory monitoring, which in turn affects metamemory control. The present research reveals that informative and, more importantly, uninformative numbers that have no influence on recall itself can bias metamemory judgments. On the basis of the current theoretical understanding of the anchoring effect and metamemory monitoring, these results offer insight into the processes that trigger metacognitive biases.
关于未来记忆表现的判断(元记忆判断)容易受到错觉和偏差的影响,这是已知的。在这里,我们探讨元记忆判断是否像许多其他形式的判断一样,会受到数字锚定的影响。实验1证实了先前的研究结果,即信息性锚定(例如,过去同伴的表现)对元记忆监测有影响。在接下来的四个实验中,我们研究了非信息性锚定的影响。所有实验都在元记忆监测上获得了显著的锚定效应;相比之下,锚定对回忆本身没有影响。我们还在实验4中研究了锚定对元记忆控制(重新学习选择)的影响。结果表明,锚定可以影响元记忆监测,进而影响元记忆控制。本研究表明,对回忆本身没有影响的信息性数字,更重要的是,非信息性数字会使元记忆判断产生偏差。基于目前对锚定效应和元记忆监测的理论理解,这些结果为触发元认知偏差的过程提供了见解。