Department of Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;20(2):O39-O45. doi: 10.1111/codi.13971.
An airtight anastomosis on intra-operative leak testing has been previously demonstrated to be associated with a lower risk of clinically significant postoperative anastomotic leak following left-sided colorectal anastomosis. However, to date, there is no consistently agreed upon method for management of an intra-operative anastomotic leak. Therefore, we powered a noninferiority study to determine whether suture repair alone was an appropriate strategy for the management of an intra-operative air leak.
This is a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data from a tertiary care referral centre. We included all consecutive patients with left-sided colorectal or ileorectal anastomoses and evidence of air leak during intra-operative leak testing. Patients were excluded if proximal diversion was planned preoperatively, a pre-existing proximal diversion was present at the time of surgery or an anastomosis was ultimately unable to be completed. The primary outcome measure was clinically significant anastomotic leak, as defined by the Surgical Infection Study Group at 30 days.
From a sample of 2360 patients, 119 had an intra-operative air leak during leak testing. Sixty-eight patients underwent suture repair alone and 51 underwent proximal diversion or anastomotic reconstruction. The clinically significant leak rate was 9% (6/68; 95% CI: 2-15%) in the suture repair alone arm and 0% (0/51) in the diversion or reconstruction arm.
Suture repair alone does not meet the criteria for noninferiority for the management of intra-operative air leak during left-sided colorectal anastomosis. Further repair of intra-operative air leak by suture repair alone should be reconsidered given these findings.
先前的研究已经证明,术中漏诊测试时进行密封吻合与降低左半结直肠吻合术后临床显著吻合口漏的风险相关。然而,迄今为止,对于术中吻合口漏的处理尚无一致认可的方法。因此,我们设计了一项非劣效性研究,以确定单独缝合修复是否是处理术中气漏的合适策略。
这是一项回顾性队列分析,对来自三级转诊中心的前瞻性收集数据进行分析。我们纳入了所有接受左半结直肠或回肠直肠吻合术且术中漏诊测试时存在气漏的连续患者。如果术前计划近端分流、手术时存在先前存在的近端分流或最终无法完成吻合,则排除患者。主要结局测量指标为术后 30 天由外科感染研究组定义的临床显著吻合口漏。
在 2360 名患者中,有 119 名患者在漏诊测试期间发生术中气漏。68 名患者仅接受缝合修复,51 名患者接受近端分流或吻合重建。单独缝合修复组的临床显著漏诊率为 9%(6/68;95%CI:2-15%),而分流或重建组为 0%(0/51)。
单独缝合修复不符合左半结直肠吻合术中处理术中气漏的非劣效性标准。鉴于这些发现,应重新考虑单独通过缝合修复来修复术中气漏。