Brown Nathan L, Jephcote Victoria E L
Dent Update. 2017 Mar;44(3):254-6, 259-60. doi: 10.12968/denu.2017.44.3.254.
Fourteen dentists at different practices in the UK assessed the dental charts of 1128 patients who were new to the dentist but not new to the practice; 44% of the dental charts were found to be inaccurate. Inaccuracy of the individual practice-based charts ranged between 16% for the best performing practices to 83% for the worst: 5% of dental charts had too many teeth charted and 5% had too few teeth charted; 13% of charts had missed amalgam restorations and 18% had missed tooth-coloured restorations; 5% of charts had amalgam restorations recorded but with the surfaces incorrect (eg an MO restoration charted but a DO restoration actually present); 9% of charts had tooth-coloured restoration surfaces incorrectly recorded. For 7.5% of charts, amalgams were charted but not actually present. Other inaccuracies were also noted. The authors reinforce the requirements of the GDC, the advice of defence organizations, and the forensic importance of accurate dental charts. Clinical relevance: Dental charting forms part of the patient’s dental records, and the GDC requires dentists to maintain complete and accurate dental records.
英国不同诊所的14名牙医对1128名初诊但并非首次到该诊所就诊的患者的牙科病历进行了评估;结果发现44%的牙科病历不准确。基于个体诊所的病历不准确率从表现最佳的诊所的16%到最差的诊所的83%不等:5%的牙科病历记录的牙齿过多,5%记录的牙齿过少;13%的病历遗漏了汞合金修复体,18%遗漏了牙齿颜色的修复体;5%的病历记录了汞合金修复体,但表面信息有误(例如,记录为近中-面修复体,但实际存在的是远中-面修复体);9%的病历牙齿颜色修复体表面记录错误。7.5%的病历记录了汞合金修复体,但实际上并不存在。还发现了其他不准确之处。作者强调了英国牙科理事会(GDC)的要求、辩护组织的建议以及准确牙科病历的法医重要性。临床相关性:牙科记录是患者牙科病历的一部分,GDC要求牙医保持完整准确的牙科记录。