a Accident and Emergency Department , Caritas Medical Centre , Sham Shui Po , Hong Kong , China.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Jul;56(7):626-632. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1406096. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
The aim of the study was to identify the composition, as either camphor, naphthalene, or paradichlorobenzene, of mothballs in the form of powder or tiny fragments by float tests and melting point tests.
Naphthalene, paradichlorobenzene and camphor mothballs were blended into powder and tiny fragments (with sizes <1/10 of the size of an intact mothball). In the float tests, the mothball powder and tiny fragments were placed in water, saturated salt solution and 50% dextrose solution (D50), and the extent to which they floated or sank in the liquids was observed. In the melting point tests, the mothball powder and tiny fragments were placed in hot water with a temperature between 53 and 80 °C, and the extent to which they melted was observed. Both the float and melting point tests were then repeated using intact mothballs. Three emergency physicians blinded to the identities of samples and solutions visually evaluated each sample.
In the float tests, paradichlorobenzene powder partially floated and partially sank in all three liquids, while naphthalene powder partially floated and partially sank in water. Naphthalene powder did not sink in D50 or saturated salt solution. Camphor powder floated in all three liquids. Float tests identified the compositions of intact mothball accurately. In the melting point tests, paradichlorobenzene powder melted completely in hot water within 1 min while naphthalene powder and camphor powder did not melt. The melted portions of paradichlorobenzene mothballs were sometimes too small to be observed in 1 min but the mothballs either partially or completely melted in 5 min. Both camphor and naphthalene intact mothballs did not melt in hot water.
For mothball powder, the melting point tests were more accurate than the float tests in differentiating between paradichlorobenzene and non-paradichlorobenzene (naphthalene or camphor). For intact mothballs, float tests performed better than melting point tests. Float tests can identify camphor mothballs but melting point tests cannot. We suggest melting point tests for identifying mothball powder and tiny fragments while float tests are recommended for intact mothball and large fragments.
本研究的目的是通过漂浮试验和熔点试验,确定粉末或微小碎片形式的樟脑丸、萘丸和对二氯苯丸的成分,这些樟脑丸的形式为樟脑、萘或对二氯苯。
将萘丸、对二氯苯丸和樟脑丸混合成粉末和微小碎片(大小<完整樟脑丸的十分之一)。在漂浮试验中,将樟脑丸粉末和微小碎片放入水中、饱和盐溶液和 50%葡萄糖溶液(D50)中,观察它们在液体中的漂浮或下沉程度。在熔点试验中,将樟脑丸粉末和微小碎片放入 53 至 80°C 之间的热水中,观察它们的融化程度。然后使用完整的樟脑丸重复漂浮和熔点试验。三位对样本和溶液身份不知情的急诊医生对每个样本进行了视觉评估。
在漂浮试验中,对二氯苯丸粉末在三种液体中部分漂浮,部分下沉,而萘丸粉末在水中部分漂浮,部分下沉。萘丸粉末在 D50 或饱和盐溶液中不下沉。樟脑丸粉末在三种液体中均漂浮。漂浮试验准确识别了完整樟脑丸的成分。在熔点试验中,对二氯苯丸粉末在 1 分钟内完全融化于热水中,而萘丸粉末和樟脑丸粉末未融化。对二氯苯丸的融化部分在 1 分钟内有时太小而无法观察到,但在 5 分钟内,这些丸剂要么部分融化,要么完全融化。在热水中,樟脑丸和萘丸均未融化。
对于樟脑丸粉末,熔点试验比漂浮试验更能准确区分对二氯苯和非对二氯苯(萘或樟脑)。对于完整的樟脑丸,漂浮试验的效果优于熔点试验。漂浮试验可以识别樟脑丸,但熔点试验不能。我们建议使用熔点试验来识别樟脑丸粉末和微小碎片,而漂浮试验则推荐用于完整的樟脑丸和大碎片。