Suppr超能文献

软因素,运输顺畅?安全氛围和团队流程在减少重症监护病房院内转运期间不良事件中的作用。

Soft Factors, Smooth Transport? The role of safety climate and team processes in reducing adverse events during intrahospital transport in intensive care.

作者信息

Latzke Markus, Schiffinger Michael, Zellhofer Dominik, Steyrer Johannes

机构信息

Markus Latzke, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Interdisciplinary Institute for Management and Organisational Behaviour, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria. E-mail:

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2020 Jan/Mar;45(1):32-40. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000188.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intrahospital patient transports (IHTs) in intensive care involve an appreciable risk of adverse events (AEs). Research on determinants of AE occurrence during IHT has hitherto focused on patient, transport, and intensive care unit (ICU) characteristics. By contrast, the role of "soft" factors, although arguably relevant for IHTs and a topic of interest in general health care settings, has not yet been explored.

PURPOSE

The study aims at examining the effect of safety climate and team processes on the occurrence of AE during IHT and whether team processes mediate the effect of safety climate.

METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Data stem from a noninterventional, observational multicenter study in 33 ICUs (from 12 European countries), with 858 transports overall recorded during 28 days. AEs include medication errors, dislodgments, equipment failures, and delays. Safety climate scales were taken from the "Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations" (short version), team processes scales from the "Leiden Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Safety" questionnaire. Patient condition was assessed with NEMS (Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score). All other variables could be directly observed. Hypothesis testing and assessment of effects rely on bivariate correlations and binomial logistic multilevel models (with ICU as random effect).

FINDINGS

Both safety climate and team processes are comparatively important determinants of AE occurrence, also when controlling for transport-, staff-, and ICU-related variables. Team processes partially mediate the effect of safety climate. Patient condition and transport duration are consistently related with AE occurrence, too.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Unlike most patient, transport, and ICU characteristics, safety climate and team processes are basically amenable to managerial interventions. Coupled with their considerable effect on AE occurrence, this makes pertinent endeavors a potentially promising approach for improving patient safety during IHT. Although literature suggests that safety climate is slow and hard to change (also compared to team processes), efforts to improve safety climate should not be forgone.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房内的院内患者转运(IHT)存在明显的不良事件(AE)风险。此前关于IHT期间AE发生的决定因素的研究主要集中在患者、转运和重症监护病房(ICU)的特征上。相比之下,“软”因素的作用虽然可以说与IHT相关,并且是一般医疗环境中感兴趣的话题,但尚未得到探讨。

目的

本研究旨在考察安全氛围和团队流程对IHT期间AE发生的影响,以及团队流程是否介导安全氛围的影响。

方法/途径:数据来自一项在33个ICU(来自12个欧洲国家)进行的非干预性观察性多中心研究,在28天内共记录了858次转运。AE包括用药错误、移位、设备故障和延误。安全氛围量表取自“医疗机构患者安全氛围”(简版),团队流程量表取自“莱顿手术室和重症监护安全”问卷。患者状况用NEMS(护理人力使用评分九等价物)进行评估。所有其他变量均可直接观察。假设检验和效应评估依赖于双变量相关性和二项逻辑多水平模型(以ICU作为随机效应)。

研究结果

安全氛围和团队流程都是AE发生的相对重要的决定因素,即使在控制了与转运、工作人员和ICU相关的变量时也是如此。团队流程部分介导了安全氛围的影响。患者状况和转运持续时间也与AE发生始终相关。

实践意义

与大多数患者、转运和ICU特征不同,安全氛围和团队流程基本上适合进行管理干预。再加上它们对AE发生有相当大的影响,这使得相关努力成为改善IHT期间患者安全的一种潜在有前景的方法。尽管文献表明安全氛围变化缓慢且难以改变(与团队流程相比也是如此),但不应放弃改善安全氛围的努力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验