Department of Psychological Science, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Addict Biol. 2019 Jan;24(1):65-75. doi: 10.1111/adb.12581. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Rats raised in an enriched condition (EC) show decreased stimulant self-administration relative to rats reared in an isolated condition (IC). However, few studies have examined the behavioral mechanisms underlying this environment-induced difference in self-administration. Because economic demand for drugs of abuse predicts addiction-like behavior in both humans and animals, we applied a behavioral economic analysis to cocaine self-administration data in EC and IC rats. During cocaine self-administration, the dose decreased across blocks of trials (0.75-0.003 mg/kg/inf), which allowed for a determination of demand intensity and demand elasticity. Demand intensity did not differ between EC and IC rats; however, cocaine was more elastic in EC rats relative to IC rats (i.e. EC rats were less willing to respond for cocaine as the unit price increased). When EC rats were placed in an isolated condition, demand elasticity decreased, whereas elasticity increased for IC rats placed in an enriched condition. Additionally, we applied behavioral economic analyses to previously published self-administration data and found that our results replicate past findings with cocaine and methylphenidate. To determine if differences in demand elasticity are specific to drug reinforcement, a separate group of rats was tested in sucrose or saccharin self-administration. Results showed that sucrose and saccharin were more elastic in EC rats relative to IC rats, and demand intensity was lower for saccharin in EC rats relative to IC rats. Overall, drug and nondrug reinforcers are more elastic in EC rats, which may account for the protective effects of environmental enrichment against stimulant self-administration.
在丰富环境中饲养的大鼠(EC)表现出相对于在隔离环境中饲养的大鼠(IC)减少的兴奋剂自我给药。然而,很少有研究检查这种环境诱导的自我给药差异背后的行为机制。因为对滥用药物的经济需求预测了人类和动物中类似成瘾的行为,我们将行为经济学分析应用于 EC 和 IC 大鼠的可卡因自我给药数据。在可卡因自我给药期间,剂量随试验块(0.75-0.003mg/kg/inf)减少,这允许确定需求强度和需求弹性。EC 和 IC 大鼠之间的需求强度没有差异;然而,可卡因在 EC 大鼠中比在 IC 大鼠中更具弹性(即 EC 大鼠随着单价增加而不太愿意对可卡因做出反应)。当 EC 大鼠被置于隔离环境中时,需求弹性降低,而当 IC 大鼠被置于丰富环境中时,弹性增加。此外,我们将行为经济学分析应用于先前发表的自我给药数据,发现我们的结果复制了可卡因和哌醋甲酯的过去发现。为了确定需求弹性的差异是否特定于药物强化,一组单独的大鼠在蔗糖或糖精自我给药中进行测试。结果表明,蔗糖和糖精在 EC 大鼠中比在 IC 大鼠中更具弹性,并且在 EC 大鼠中,相对于 IC 大鼠,糖精的需求强度更低。总体而言,药物和非药物强化物在 EC 大鼠中更具弹性,这可能解释了环境丰富对兴奋剂自我给药的保护作用。