Ni Longxing, Tang Rongying, He Tao, Chang Jinlan, Li Jiahui, Li Sarah, Ccahuana-Vasquez Renzo Alberto, Cheng Richard, Grender Julie
Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Department of Operative Dentistry& Endodontics School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Am J Dent. 2017 Oct;30(5):272-278.
To evaluate the anti-plaque efficacy (Study 1) and the anti-gingivitis efficacy (Study 2) of a manual toothbrush with tapered bristles compared to marketed control manual toothbrushes.
Studies 1 and 2 were independent, randomized and controlled, single-center, examiner-blind clinical trials in generally healthy adults. Study 1 included a 2-day acclimation period, followed by a 5-day twice daily toothbrushing test phase with the assigned brush. Baseline and Day 5 pre- and post-brushing plaque levels were assessed via Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI). In Study 2, subjects with existing gingivitis brushed with their assigned toothbrush twice daily for 4 weeks. Gingivitis was measured using the Mazza Modification of the Papillary Bleeding Index at Baseline and Weeks 2 and 4. In both trials, subjects were randomly assigned to either the manual toothbrush with tapered bristles (Oral-B Super Thin Indicator toothbrush, OM159) or the marketed control (Study 1: Oral-B Complete Clean & Sensitive toothbrush; Study 2: Crest Pro-Health Complete 7 Brush 35 toothbrush) for use with a regular fluoridated dentifrice.
40 (Study 1) and 63 (Study 2) subjects were randomized in each trial. In Study 1, both the tapered bristle and marketed control brushes provided significant (P< 0.0001) mean whole mouth plaque reductions at Day 1 and Day 5 post-brushing relative to pre-brushing as measured via TMQPHI, with no between-brush significant differences. Both groups showed a significant reduction in Day 5 post-brushing mean plaque scores versus Day 1 pre- brushing mean plaque scores (P< 0.0001), but the reductions were not significantly different between groups (P= 0.4274). In Study 2, both the tapered bristle brush and the marketed control brush produced significant (P< 0.0001) reductions in both gingivitis and number of gingival bleeding sites at both Weeks 2 and 4 versus baseline. At Week 4, the tapered filament toothbrush group showed 8.6% less gingivitis (P= 0.0017) and 33.4% fewer bleeding sites (P= 0.0030) versus the control brush. All toothbrushes were well-tolerated.
Twice daily customary use of a manual toothbrush with tapered bristles provided clinically meaningful plaque and gingivitis reduction benefits.
评估一款刷毛呈锥形的手动牙刷与市售对照手动牙刷相比的抗牙菌斑功效(研究1)和抗牙龈炎功效(研究2)。
研究1和研究2为独立、随机、对照、单中心、检查者盲法的临床试验,受试对象为一般健康的成年人。研究1包括为期2天的适应期,随后是为期5天的每日两次使用指定牙刷刷牙的测试阶段。通过Turesky改良的Quigley-Hein菌斑指数(TMQHPI)评估基线时以及第5天刷牙前后的全口菌斑水平。在研究2中,患有牙龈炎的受试者每天使用指定牙刷刷牙两次,持续4周。在基线时以及第2周和第4周使用乳头出血指数的Mazza改良版测量牙龈炎情况。在两项试验中,受试者被随机分配使用刷毛呈锥形的手动牙刷(欧乐B超细丝指示器牙刷,OM159)或市售对照产品(研究1:欧乐B全效清洁&敏感型牙刷;研究2:佳洁士健康专家全效7支装35号牙刷),并搭配常规含氟牙膏使用。
每项试验各有40名(研究1)和63名(研究2)受试者被随机分组。在研究1中,通过TMQPHI测量,与刷牙前相比,刷毛呈锥形的牙刷和市售对照牙刷在刷牙后第1天和第5天全口菌斑平均减少量均具有显著统计学意义(P<0.0001),牙刷之间无显著差异。两组在刷牙后第5天的平均菌斑得分相对于刷牙前第1天的平均菌斑得分均显著降低(P<0.0001),但两组间的降低幅度无显著差异(P=0.4274)。在研究2中,与基线相比,刷毛呈锥形的牙刷和市售对照牙刷在第2周和第4周时牙龈炎和牙龈出血部位数量均显著减少(P<0.0001)。在第4周时,与对照牙刷相比,刷毛呈锥形的牙刷组牙龈炎减少8.6%(P=0.0017),出血部位减少33.4%(P=0.0030)。所有牙刷耐受性良好。
每日两次常规使用刷毛呈锥形的手动牙刷可在临床上显著减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎。