Suppr超能文献

可穿戴式心脏复律除颤器作为植入式心脏转复除颤器(ICD)或心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)相关感染患者再次植入的桥梁。

The wearable cardioverter defibrillator as a bridge to reimplantation in patients with ICD or CRT-D-related infections.

作者信息

Castro L, Pecha S, Linder M, Vogler J, Gosau N, Meyer C, Willems S, Reichenspurner H, Hakmi S

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Nov 25;12(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0669-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The approach to treat device infection in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) is a challenging procedure. Optimal treatment is complete extraction of the infected device. To protect these patients from sudden cardiac arrest while waiting for reimplantation and to avoid recurrent infection, a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) seems to be a valuable solution. Therefore, we investigated the management and outcome of patients with ICD or CRT-D infections using the WCD as a bridge to re-implantation after lead extraction procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patients who underwent ICD or CRT-D removal due to device-related local or systemic infections. All patients were prescribed a WCD at our center between 01/2012 and 10/2015. All patients returned to our outpatient clinic for regular ICD or CRT-D monitoring initially 1 and 3 months after reimplantation followed by 6-months intervals.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (mean age 65.0 ± 8.0 years, male 76.2%) were included in the study. Complete lead extraction was achieved in all patients. While waiting for reimplantation one patient experienced a symptomatic episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia. This episode was converted successfully into sinus rhythm by a single 150 J shock. Mean follow-up time 392 ± 206 days, showing survival rate of 100% and freedom from reinfection in all patients.

CONCLUSION

The WCD seems to be a valuable bridging option for patients with ICD or CRT-D infections, showing no recurrent device infection.

摘要

背景

治疗植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)或心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)患者的装置感染是一项具有挑战性的操作。最佳治疗方法是完全取出感染的装置。为了在等待重新植入期间保护这些患者免受心脏骤停,并避免反复感染,可穿戴式心脏复律除颤器(WCD)似乎是一个有价值的解决方案。因此,我们研究了使用WCD作为导线拔除术后重新植入的桥梁,对ICD或CRT-D感染患者的管理及预后情况。

方法

我们对因装置相关的局部或全身感染而接受ICD或CRT-D移除的连续患者进行了一项回顾性研究。2012年1月至2015年10月期间,所有患者在我们中心均被处方了WCD。所有患者在重新植入后最初1个月和3个月返回我们的门诊进行常规ICD或CRT-D监测,随后间隔6个月进行监测。

结果

21例患者(平均年龄65.0±8.0岁,男性占76.2%)纳入研究。所有患者均成功完成导线拔除。在等待重新植入期间,1例患者发生了有症状的持续性室性心动过速发作。单次150J电击成功将该发作转为窦性心律。平均随访时间392±206天,所有患者的生存率为100%,且无再次感染。

结论

对于ICD或CRT-D感染患者,WCD似乎是一种有价值的过渡选择,未出现装置反复感染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cf3/5702096/605e2660d775/13019_2017_669_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验