Wageningen University and Research Centre, Soil Physics and Land Management Group, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Bahir Dar University, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 5501, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Soil Physics and Land Management Group, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Environ Manage. 2018 Feb 1;207:230-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.044. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
Farmers possess a wealth of knowledge regarding soil erosion and soil and water conservation (SWC), and there is a great demand to access it. However, there has been little effort to systematically document farmers' experiences and perceptions of SWC measures. Sustainable Land Management (SLM) has largely evolved through local traditional practices rather than adoption based on scientific evidence. This research aimed to assess soil erosion and performance of different SWC measures from the farmers' perspective by documenting their perceptions and experiences in Koga catchment, Ethiopia. To this aim, workshops were organised in three sub-catchments differing in slopes and SWC measures. Workshops included group discussions and field monitoring of erosion indicators and systematically describing the status of soil erosion, soil fertility and yield to assess the performance of SWC measures. Results show that farmers are aware of the harmful effects of ongoing soil erosion and of the impacts of mitigation measures on their farms. Sheet erosion was found to be the most widespread form of erosion while rill damage was critical on plots cultivated to cereals on steep slopes. The average rill erosion rates were 24.2 and 47.3 t/ha/y in treated and untreated farmlands, respectively. SWC reduced rill erosion on average by more than 48%. However, the impacts of SWC measures varied significantly between sub-watersheds, and farmers believed that SWC measures did not prevent erosion completely. Comparatively, graded stone-faced soil bunds revealed maximum desired impacts and were most appreciated by farmers, whereas level bunds caused water logging. Most traditional ditches were highly graded and begun incising and affected production of cereals. Despite the semi-quantitative nature of the methodology, using farmers' perceptions and experiences to document land degradation and the impacts of SWC measures is crucial as they are the daily users of the land and therefore directly affecting the success or failure of SWC measures.
农民在土壤侵蚀和水土保持(SWC)方面拥有丰富的知识,并且有很大的需求来获取这些知识。然而,很少有人努力系统地记录农民对 SWC 措施的经验和看法。可持续土地管理(SLM)主要是通过当地传统实践而不是基于科学证据的采用而发展起来的。本研究旨在通过记录埃塞俄比亚科加流域农民对不同 SWC 措施的看法和经验,从农民的角度评估土壤侵蚀和 SWC 措施的性能。为此,在三个坡度和 SWC 措施不同的子流域组织了研讨会。研讨会包括小组讨论和侵蚀指标的实地监测,并系统地描述土壤侵蚀、土壤肥力和产量的状况,以评估 SWC 措施的性能。结果表明,农民意识到正在发生的土壤侵蚀的有害影响,以及缓解措施对其农场的影响。片蚀被发现是最普遍的侵蚀形式,而在陡峭的斜坡上种植谷物的地块中,沟蚀则是关键的。处理和未处理农田的平均沟蚀速率分别为 24.2 和 47.3 t/ha/y。SWC 措施平均减少了 48%以上的沟蚀。然而,SWC 措施的影响在子流域之间存在显著差异,农民认为 SWC 措施并不能完全防止侵蚀。相比之下,分级石面土埂具有最大的期望影响,最受农民欢迎,而水平埂则会造成水涝。大多数传统沟渠都有很高的坡度,开始侵蚀并影响谷物的产量。尽管该方法具有半定量的性质,但利用农民的看法和经验来记录土地退化和 SWC 措施的影响至关重要,因为他们是土地的日常使用者,因此直接影响 SWC 措施的成败。