Suppr超能文献

预测 2 型糖尿病患者生活质量和其他患者报告结局的因素:PANORAMA 多国研究

Predictors of Quality of Life and Other Patient-Reported Outcomes in the PANORAMA Multinational Study of People With Type 2 Diabetes.

机构信息

Health Psychology Research Unit, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, U.K.

INSERM, Paris, France.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):267-276. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2655. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

PANORAMA, a nine-country cross-sectional type 2 diabetes study, investigated factors associated with quality of life (QoL), health status, and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were randomly or consecutively selected from primary/secondary care. PROMs included the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) (generic QoL item and average weighted impact [AWI] scores), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) (patient- and physician-completed), Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II worry subscale, and the EuroQoL-5 Dimension visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) measuring patient-reported health. Multivariable linear regression analyses determined predictors of each PROM including patient characteristics, physician-reported adherence, complications, and glycosylated hemoglobin.

RESULTS

In 5,813 patients, mean PROM scores indicated that generic QoL approximated "good" (0.93); perceived impact of diabetes on QoL was negative (AWI -1.69). Treatment satisfaction exceeded physicians' estimates (patient-reported: 29.76; physician-estimated: 27.75), but so did patients' perceived frequency of hypo-/hyperglycemia. Worry about hypoglycemia (13.27) was apparent. Intensifying treatments to three oral agents or insulin regimens predicted worse QoL (AWI < 0.01). Insulin alone use predicted worse QoL (generic < 0.02; AWI < 0.001) and hypoglycemia worry ( < 0.007). No treatment had significant associations with EQ-VAS health status.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors for different PROMs differed markedly and provided insights for understanding and improving these important outcomes. Intensive treatment regimens had significant negative associations with all PROMs, except the EQ-VAS health status measure. The findings demonstrate the importance of measuring QoL alongside health status and other patient-reported outcomes when evaluating diabetes treatments with a view to protecting QoL and facilitating adherence and long-term glycemic control.

摘要

目的

全景研究是一项九国的 2 型糖尿病横断面研究,旨在调查与生活质量(QoL)、健康状况和其他患者报告结局测量(PROMs)相关的因素。

研究设计和方法

患者从初级/二级保健中随机或连续选择。PROMs 包括糖尿病依赖性生活质量审核(ADDQoL)(通用 QoL 项目和平均加权影响[AWI]评分)、糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ)(患者和医生完成)、低血糖恐惧调查-II 担忧子量表和欧洲五维健康量表视觉模拟评分(EQ-VAS),用于测量患者报告的健康状况。多变量线性回归分析确定了每个 PROM 的预测因素,包括患者特征、医生报告的依从性、并发症和糖化血红蛋白。

结果

在 5813 名患者中,平均 PROM 评分表明通用 QoL 接近“良好”(0.93);糖尿病对 QoL 的影响被认为是负面的(AWI -1.69)。治疗满意度超过了医生的估计(患者报告:29.76;医生估计:27.75),但患者感知的低血糖/高血糖频率也更高。对低血糖的担忧(13.27)很明显。将治疗方案强化至三种口服药物或胰岛素方案会导致 QoL 更差(AWI < 0.01)。单独使用胰岛素会导致 QoL 更差(通用 QoL < 0.02;AWI < 0.001)和低血糖担忧(< 0.007)。没有治疗方案与 EQ-VAS 健康状况有显著关联。

结论

不同 PROM 的预测因素差异显著,为理解和改善这些重要结局提供了依据。强化治疗方案与所有 PROM 均呈显著负相关,除 EQ-VAS 健康状况测量外。这些发现表明,在评估糖尿病治疗时,除了健康状况和其他患者报告的结局外,测量 QoL 也很重要,这有助于保护 QoL 并促进依从性和长期血糖控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验