Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1807-1812. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx305.
We assess the safety of performing the epidural placement or revision of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients whose anticoagulation has been held (termed "anticoagulant-suspended" patients) in accordance with the 2017 Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) guidelines.
Patients undergoing SCS were included in this institutional review board-approved study.
A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Any adverse event occurring within 90 days after SCS lead placement/revision was included.
A total of 225 patients who had a total of 239 surgeries including lead placement or lead revision were included; 182 patients were not on anticoagulants, 37 patients used one anticoagulant, and six patients used two or more anticoagulants. There were 13 adverse events. Anticoagulant use as a whole had no significant relationship to operative or postoperative adverse effects (χ2(1) = 1.613, P > 0.05). No anticoagulant on its own contributed significantly to adverse events; however, a small set of surgical cases showed a significantly greater incidence of adverse events for patients on enoxaparin used in combination with other anticoagulants (P < 0.05, N = 4).
This study is the first to demonstrate that anticoagulant-suspended patients have no increased risk of perioperative hemorrhagic or thromboembolic adverse effects following SCS surgery compared with nonanticoagulated patients. The findings of this study validate the safety of neuromodulation in anticoagulation-suspended patients, concurring with the findings of previously described case studies, which anecdotally described neuromodulation outcomes in patients whose anticoagulation regimen had been temporarily held.
我们评估了根据 2017 年神经刺激适宜性共识委员会(NACC)指南,对接受抗凝治疗(称为“抗凝暂停”患者)的脊髓刺激(SCS)患者进行硬膜外放置或修正的安全性。
本机构审查委员会批准的研究纳入了接受 SCS 治疗的患者。
对前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性分析。纳入 SCS 导丝放置/修正后 90 天内发生的任何不良事件。
共纳入 225 例患者,共进行了 239 例手术,包括导丝放置或导丝修正;182 例患者未使用抗凝剂,37 例患者使用一种抗凝剂,6 例患者使用两种或两种以上抗凝剂。共有 13 例不良事件。抗凝剂的使用与手术或术后不良影响之间没有显著的关系(χ2(1) = 1.613,P > 0.05)。没有单独的抗凝剂显著增加不良事件的发生率;然而,一小部分手术病例显示,使用依诺肝素联合其他抗凝剂的患者不良事件发生率显著更高(P < 0.05,N = 4)。
本研究首次证明,与未抗凝的患者相比,SCS 手术后,抗凝暂停患者围手术期出血或血栓栓塞不良事件的风险没有增加。本研究的结果验证了在抗凝暂停患者中进行神经调节的安全性,与先前描述的病例研究结果一致,这些病例研究描述了抗凝方案暂时暂停的患者的神经调节结果。