Suppr超能文献

黑暗育雏笼和顶棚对生长缓慢的肉鸡自由活动和行为的影响。

Effects of dark brooders and overhangs on free-range use and behaviour of slow-growing broilers.

机构信息

1Animal Sciences Unit,Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food,Scheldeweg 68,9090 Melle,Belgium.

3Behavioural Ecology Group,Wageningen University,De Elst 1 6708 WD,Wageningen,The Netherlands.

出版信息

Animal. 2018 Aug;12(8):1621-1630. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117003184. Epub 2017 Dec 4.

Abstract

Broiler chickens often make limited use of the free-range area. Range use is influenced by type of shelter available. Range use may possibly be improved by a more gradual transition from the house to the range and by using dark brooders (secluded warm, dark areas in the home pen) that mimic aspects of a broody hen and possibly reduce fearfulness. The aim of this study was to assess effects of dark brooders on fearfulness, free-range use and behaviour later in life. Another aim was to test the chickens' preference for shelter type and the effects of overhangs outside of the pop holes to provide a gradual transition to the range. Three production rounds, each with 440 Sasso broiler chickens (110/group), were completed. Chicks were housed indoors from days 0 to 25; per round, two groups had access to a dark brooder, whereas the other two groups had conventional IR lamps. Fearfulness was assessed by the open field (OF) and tonic immobility (TI) tests on days 22 to 24 on 25 chicks/group per round. Birds were then moved to four mobile houses from which they could access both grassland with artificial shelter (AS) and short rotation coppice (SRC). Two of the houses had overhangs extending from the pop holes; these were switched between the four houses weekly. Free-range use and behaviour were observed three times daily from Monday to Friday. Dark brooders did not affect results from the OF or TI test, except for jumps in the OF test which tended to occur less often in brooded chicks. Neither dark brooders (34.9% without v. 31.7% with brooder) nor overhangs (32.5% without v. 34.1% with overhangs) influenced the percentage of chickens outside. Chickens showed a clear preference for SRC, range use increased over time in SRC, and more birds ranged farther from the house in SRC. Behaviours of chickens observed outside were mainly influenced by shelter type, age of the birds and distance from the house. Locomotion tended to occur more in the presence of overhangs. Overall, these results could not confirm the hypothesis that dark brooders would decrease fearfulness and thereby increase free-range use. Overhangs also did not improve free-range use, and neither brooders nor overhangs had considerable impact on behaviour of chickens outside. Chickens clearly preferred dense natural vegetation over AS and ranged farther in it, indicating that this type of shelter is more suitable for slow-growing free-range broilers.

摘要

肉用仔鸡通常对放养区的利用有限。可用的庇护所类型会影响到鸡的放养利用情况。通过从鸡舍到放养区的逐渐过渡,以及使用黑暗育雏器(家庭围栏内僻静、温暖、黑暗的区域),可以模仿抱窝母鸡的某些方面,从而减少鸡的恐惧心理,这可能会增加鸡的放养利用情况。本研究的目的是评估黑暗育雏器对鸡的恐惧心理、放养利用情况和后期行为的影响。另一个目的是测试鸡对庇护所类型的偏好,以及在鸡舍外的雨棚的影响,以便逐渐过渡到放养区。完成了三个生产轮次,每个轮次有 440 只 Sasso 肉鸡(每组 110 只)。雏鸡从第 0 天到第 25 天在室内饲养;每个轮次,两组鸡可以使用黑暗育雏器,而另外两组鸡可以使用常规的红外灯。在第 22 天至第 24 天,每个轮次对每组 25 只雏鸡进行开放场(OF)和强直不动(TI)测试,以评估鸡的恐惧心理。然后,这些鸡被转移到四个移动鸡舍中,它们可以进入带人工遮蔽物(AS)的草地和短轮伐期的萌生林(SRC)。其中两个鸡舍的雨棚从鸡舍的通风口延伸出来;这些雨棚每周在四个鸡舍之间切换。从周一到周五,每天三次观察鸡的放养利用情况和行为。黑暗育雏器并没有影响 OF 或 TI 测试的结果,除了 OF 测试中的跳跃次数,育雏鸡的跳跃次数往往较少。无论是黑暗育雏器(无育雏器的鸡为 34.9%,有育雏器的鸡为 31.7%)还是雨棚(无雨棚的鸡为 32.5%,有雨棚的鸡为 34.1%)都没有影响鸡在室外的比例。鸡明显更喜欢 SRC,随着时间的推移,它们在 SRC 中的放养利用情况增加,而且更多的鸡在 SRC 中远离鸡舍的地方放养。在室外观察到的鸡的行为主要受庇护所类型、鸡的年龄和与鸡舍的距离的影响。在有雨棚的情况下,鸡的活动更频繁。总体而言,这些结果不能证实黑暗育雏器会降低鸡的恐惧心理,从而增加鸡的放养利用情况这一假设。雨棚也没有改善鸡的放养利用情况,育雏器和雨棚都没有对鸡在室外的行为产生显著影响。鸡明显更喜欢茂密的自然植被而不是人工遮蔽物,而且在自然植被中放养的距离更远,这表明这种类型的庇护所更适合生长缓慢的自由放养肉鸡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验