Lancman Guido, Tremblay Douglas, Barley Kevin, Barlogie Bart, Cho Hearn Jay, Jagannath Sundar, Madduri Deepu, Moshier Erin, Parekh Samir, Chari Ajai
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2017 Nov;15(11):870-879.
Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous disease with a prognosis that varies with patient factors, disease burden, tumor biology, and treatments. Certain molecular abnormalities confer a worse prognosis and thus are considered high-risk. These include t(4;14), del(17p), t(14;16), t(14;20), hypodiploidy, and gain(1q)/del(1p). In our previous review in 2013, we discussed the effect of available therapies on prognosis in these high-risk patients. Since then, seven phase 3 clinical trials in relapsed myeloma with 1 to 3 lines of therapy have been conducted, resulting in the approval of panobinostat, ixazomib, daratumumab, and elotuzumab, as well as additional data on carfilzomib. In our current review of these studies, all the novel therapies resulted in an improvement in progression-free survival for high-risk patients, but none of the trials provided clear statistical evidence that they overcame high-risk status. Moreover, there are several limitations in the currently available data. For example, the patient's Revised International Staging System score is generally not reported, and even when it is reported, it is usually at the time of initial diagnosis rather than at the time of study entry. Furthermore, the methodology used to determine risk suffers from technologic issues. Finally, the clonal and allele burden and concurrent molecular abnormalities can affect risk status and prognosis. To determine the optimal therapy for high-risk patients, future clinical trials should provide standardized risk assessments for all patients in addition to hazard ratios for Kaplan-Meier survival curves of high-risk patients vs those of standard-risk patients to determine if high-risk status has truly been overcome by a novel agent.
多发性骨髓瘤是一种异质性疾病,其预后因患者因素、疾病负担、肿瘤生物学特性及治疗方法而异。某些分子异常预示着更差的预后,因此被视为高危因素。这些因素包括t(4;14)、del(17p)、t(14;16)、t(14;20)、亚二倍体以及1q增益/del(1p)。在我们2013年的上一篇综述中,我们讨论了现有疗法对这些高危患者预后的影响。自那时以来,已经开展了7项针对复发骨髓瘤且采用1至3线治疗方案的3期临床试验,结果帕比司他、伊沙佐米、达雷妥尤单抗和埃罗妥珠单抗获批上市,同时还获得了关于卡非佐米的更多数据。在我们对这些研究的当前综述中,所有新型疗法均使高危患者的无进展生存期得到改善,但没有一项试验提供明确的统计学证据表明它们克服了高危状态。此外,现有数据存在若干局限性。例如,患者的国际分期系统修订版评分通常未报告,即便报告了,通常也是在初始诊断时而非研究入组时。此外,用于确定风险的方法存在技术问题。最后,克隆和等位基因负担以及并发的分子异常会影响风险状态和预后。为了确定高危患者的最佳治疗方案,未来的临床试验除了应提供高危患者与标准风险患者的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线的风险比外,还应为所有患者提供标准化的风险评估,以确定新型药物是否真的克服了高危状态。