Hammarfelt Björn, de Rijcke Sarah, Wouters Paul
Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University of Borås, Allégatan 1, 501 90 Borås, Sweden.
CWTS, Leiden University, 2333 AL Leiden, The Netherlands.
Minerva. 2017;55(4):391-411. doi: 10.1007/s11024-017-9329-x. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Global university rankings have become increasingly important 'calculative devices' for assessing the 'quality' of higher education and research. Their ability to make characteristics of universities 'calculable' is here exemplified by the first proper university ranking ever, produced as early as 1910 by the American psychologist James McKeen Cattell. Our paper links the epistemological rationales behind the construction of this ranking to the sociopolitical context in which Cattell operated: an era in which psychology became institutionalized against the backdrop of the eugenics movement, and in which statistics of science became used to counter a perceived decline in 'great men.' Over time, however, the 'eminent man,' shaped foremost by heredity and upbringing, came to be replaced by the excellent university as the emblematic symbol of scientific and intellectual strength. We also show that Cattell's ranking was generative of new forms of the social, traces of which can still be found today in the enactment of 'excellence' in global university rankings.
全球大学排名已日益成为评估高等教育和研究“质量”的重要“计算工具”。大学排名使大学的特征具有“可计算性”,这一点最早体现在1910年由美国心理学家詹姆斯·麦基恩·卡特尔编制的首个正式大学排名中。我们的论文将这一排名背后的认识论依据与卡特尔所处的社会政治背景联系起来:在这个时代,心理学在优生学运动的背景下实现了制度化,科学统计数据被用来应对人们所感觉到的“伟人”数量的减少。然而,随着时间的推移,主要由遗传和教养塑造的“杰出人物”逐渐被优秀大学所取代,优秀大学成为科学和智力实力的象征。我们还表明,卡特尔的排名催生了新的社会形式,如今在全球大学排名中“卓越”的制定过程中仍能找到其痕迹。