Suppr超能文献

年龄校正 D-二聚体在肺栓塞预测中的应用:正常年龄校正 D-二聚体能否排除 PE?

Age-Adjusted D-Dimer in the Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism: Does a Normal Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Rule Out PE?

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Cardiology Section, Department of Veteran Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4867060. doi: 10.1155/2017/4867060. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

Risk assessment for pulmonary embolism (PE) currently relies on physician judgment, clinical decision rules (CDR), and D-dimer testing. There is still controversy regarding the role of D-dimer testing in low or intermediate risk patients. The objective of the study was to define the role of clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing in patients suspected of having a PE. Records of 894 patients referred for computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) at a University medical center were analyzed. The clinical decision rules overall had an ROC of approximately 0.70, while signs of DVT had the highest ROC (0.80). A low probability CDR coupled with a negative age-adjusted D-dimer largely excluded PE. The negative predictive value (NPV) of an intermediate CDR was 86-89%, while the addition of a negative D-dimer resulted in NPVs of 94%. Thus, in patients suspected of having a PE, a low or intermediate CDR does not exclude PE; however, in patients with an intermediate CDR, a normal age-adjusted D-dimer increases the NPV.

摘要

目前,肺栓塞(PE)的风险评估依赖于医生的判断、临床决策规则(CDR)和 D-二聚体检测。在低危或中危患者中,D-二聚体检测的作用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是确定临床决策规则和 D-二聚体检测在疑似患有 PE 的患者中的作用。分析了在大学医疗中心接受计算机断层肺动脉造影(CTPA)检查的 894 名患者的记录。总的来说,临床决策规则的 ROC 约为 0.70,而深静脉血栓形成的迹象具有最高的 ROC(0.80)。低概率 CDR 加上阴性年龄调整的 D-二聚体基本排除了 PE。中等 CDR 的阴性预测值(NPV)为 86-89%,而阴性 D-二聚体的加入则使 NPV 达到 94%。因此,在疑似患有 PE 的患者中,低危或中危 CDR 不能排除 PE;然而,对于中等 CDR 的患者,正常的年龄调整的 D-二聚体增加了 NPV。

相似文献

1
Age-Adjusted D-Dimer in the Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism: Does a Normal Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Rule Out PE?
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4867060. doi: 10.1155/2017/4867060. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
2
Comparison of the age-adjusted and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in the ED.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 May;37(5):845-850. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.07.053. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):709-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00002.
9
Long-Term Experience With a Mandatory Clinical Decision Rule and Mandatory d-Dimer in the Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Dec;15(12):1673-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Imaging Stewardship and Healthcare Savings: Utilization of Age Adjusted D-Dimer to Rule Out Acute Pulmonary Embolism.
HCA Healthc J Med. 2021 Aug 29;2(4):297-301. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1219. eCollection 2021.
2
Diagnosing pulmonary thromboembolism: Concerns and controversies.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2022 Jan;78(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Negative D-dimer testing excludes pulmonary embolism in non-high risk patients in the emergency department.
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Jun;24(3):273-280. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1478-6. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
2
Acute pulmonary embolism with precordial T-wave inversion and negative D-dimer.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;35(3):520.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.09.061. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 5;2016(8):CD010864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010864.pub2.
4
Diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic management of acute pulmonary embolism.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Aug;44(3):164-72. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1210471. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
7
D-dimer for pulmonary embolism.
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1668-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3703.
8
Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2135.
10
Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):448-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验