Suppr超能文献

机械取栓术及挽救治疗伴粥样硬化的颅内大动脉闭塞。

Mechanical thrombectomy and rescue therapy for intracranial large artery occlusion with underlying atherosclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Aug;10(8):746-750. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013489. Epub 2017 Dec 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy plus rescue therapy for intracranial large artery occlusion (ILAO) with underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS).

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the intervention group of EAST (Endovascular Therapy for Acute ischemic Stroke Trial) were analyzed. For underlying ICAS identified during the stent retrieval procedure, rescue treatment was required for those with (1) a degree of arterial stenosis >70% or (2) any degree of arterial with blood flow impairment or (3) evidence of re-occlusion. Outcomes were compared between the ICAS group and the embolic group. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine independent predictors of functional independence at 90 days.

RESULTS

Among the 140 patients included in the analysis, underlying ICAS was identified in 47 (34%), and 30 patients (21.4%) were considered to be eligible to receive rescue treatment. Of the 30 patients, 27 (90%) actually received rescue therapy. Recanalization rate (95.7% vs 96.8%, P=0.757) and functional independence at 90 days (63.8% vs 51.6%, P=0.169) were comparable between the ICAS group and the embolic group. No significant difference in symptomatic hemorrhage (4.3% vs 4.3%, P=1.000) or death (12.8% vs 12.9%, P=0.982) was found between the two groups. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at presentation (OR=0.865, 95% CI 0.795 to 0.941; P=0.001) and modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction after the procedure (OR=2.864, 95% CI 1.018 to 8.061; P=0.046) were independently associated with functional independence at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical thrombectomy is safe in patients with ILAO with underlying ICAS. By employing a standard rescue therapy, favorable outcomes could be achieved in such patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02350283 (Post-results).

摘要

目的

研究机械血栓切除术联合颅内大血管闭塞(ILAO)伴颅内动脉粥样硬化(ICAS)的补救治疗的安全性和疗效。

方法

分析 EAST(急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗试验)干预组患者。对于支架取出过程中发现的基础 ICAS,如果存在(1)动脉狭窄程度>70%,或(2)任何程度的血流受损的动脉,或(3)再闭塞的证据,则需要进行补救治疗。比较 ICAS 组和栓塞组的结果。采用多变量逻辑回归确定 90 天功能独立的独立预测因子。

结果

在纳入分析的 140 例患者中,47 例(34%)存在基础 ICAS,30 例(21.4%)被认为有资格接受补救治疗。在 30 例患者中,27 例(90%)实际接受了补救治疗。再通率(95.7%比 96.8%,P=0.757)和 90 天功能独立性(63.8%比 51.6%,P=0.169)在 ICAS 组和栓塞组之间无显著差异。两组之间无症状性出血(4.3%比 4.3%,P=1.000)或死亡(12.8%比 12.9%,P=0.982)也无显著差异。就诊时国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(OR=0.865,95%CI 0.795 至 0.941;P=0.001)和改良后血管内治疗后脑梗死溶栓(OR=2.864,95%CI 1.018 至 8.061;P=0.046)与 90 天功能独立性独立相关。

结论

机械血栓切除术在 ILAO 伴基础 ICAS 的患者中是安全的。通过采用标准的补救治疗方法,可以使此类患者获得良好的治疗效果。

临床试验注册

NCT02350283(结果后)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验