Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan;2(1):57-64. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
Human activity is causing wild populations to experience rapid trait change and local extirpation. The resulting effects on intraspecific variation could have substantial consequences for ecological processes and ecosystem services. Although researchers have long acknowledged that variation among species influences the surrounding environment, only recently has evidence accumulated for the ecological importance of variation within species. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the ecological effects of variation within a species (intraspecific effects) with the effects of replacement or removal of that species (species effects). We evaluated direct and indirect ecological responses, including changes in abundance (or biomass), rates of ecological processes and changes in community composition. Our results show that intraspecific effects are often comparable to, and sometimes stronger than, species effects. Species effects tend to be larger for direct ecological responses (for example, through consumption), whereas intraspecific effects and species effects tend to be similar for indirect responses (for example, through trophic cascades). Intraspecific effects are especially strong when indirect interactions alter community composition. Our results summarize data from the first generation of studies examining the relative ecological effects of intraspecific variation. Our conclusions can help inform the design of future experiments and the formulation of strategies to quantify and conserve biodiversity.
人类活动正导致野生种群经历快速的特征变化和局部灭绝。这对种内变异的影响可能对生态过程和生态系统服务产生重大影响。尽管研究人员早就承认物种之间的变异会影响周围环境,但直到最近,种内变异对生态的重要性才得到证实。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了一个物种内的变异(种内效应)与该物种的替代或去除(物种效应)对生态的影响。我们评估了直接和间接的生态响应,包括丰度(或生物量)的变化、生态过程的速率以及群落组成的变化。我们的结果表明,种内效应通常与物种效应相当,有时甚至更强。物种效应往往更大,因为直接的生态响应(例如,通过消费),而种内效应和物种效应往往相似,因为间接响应(例如,通过营养级联)。当间接相互作用改变群落组成时,种内效应尤其强烈。我们的结果总结了第一代研究中检查种内变异相对生态效应的数据。我们的结论可以帮助指导未来实验的设计和制定量化和保护生物多样性的策略。