Suppr超能文献

成人人工耳蜗使用者噪声下言语识别的词汇获取能力和认知预测因子。

Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

机构信息

1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Section Ear & Hearing and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517743887. doi: 10.1177/2331216517743887.

Abstract

Not all of the variance in speech-recognition performance of cochlear implant (CI) users can be explained by biographic and auditory factors. In normal-hearing listeners, linguistic and cognitive factors determine most of speech-in-noise performance. The current study explored specifically the influence of visually measured lexical-access ability compared with other cognitive factors on speech recognition of 24 postlingually deafened CI users. Speech-recognition performance was measured with monosyllables in quiet (consonant-vowel-consonant [CVC]), sentences-in-noise (SIN), and digit-triplets in noise (DIN). In addition to a composite variable of lexical-access ability (LA), measured with a lexical-decision test (LDT) and word-naming task, vocabulary size, working-memory capacity (Reading Span test [RSpan]), and a visual analogue of the SIN test (text reception threshold test) were measured. The DIN test was used to correct for auditory factors in SIN thresholds by taking the difference between SIN and DIN: SRT. Correlation analyses revealed that duration of hearing loss (dHL) was related to SIN thresholds. Better working-memory capacity was related to SIN and SRT scores. LDT reaction time was positively correlated with SRT scores. No significant relationships were found for CVC or DIN scores with the predictor variables. Regression analyses showed that together with dHL, RSpan explained 55% of the variance in SIN thresholds. When controlling for auditory performance, LA, LDT, and RSpan separately explained, together with dHL, respectively 37%, 36%, and 46% of the variance in SRT outcome. The results suggest that poor verbal working-memory capacity and to a lesser extent poor lexical-access ability limit speech-recognition ability in listeners with a CI.

摘要

并非所有人工耳蜗(CI)使用者的语音识别表现差异都可以用生理和听觉因素来解释。在正常听力者中,语言和认知因素决定了他们在噪声环境下言语识别的大部分表现。本研究专门探讨了与其他认知因素相比,通过视觉测量得出的词汇获取能力对 24 名后天聋的 CI 用户语音识别的影响。语音识别能力通过安静环境下的单音节(辅音-元音-辅音 [CVC])、噪声下的句子(SIN)和噪声下的数字三连音(DIN)进行测量。除了使用词汇决策测试(LDT)和命名任务测量的词汇获取能力(LA)综合变量外,还测量了词汇量、工作记忆能力(阅读跨度测试 [RSpan])和 SIN 测试的视觉模拟(文本接收阈值测试)。DIN 测试用于通过 SIN 和 DIN 之间的差异来校正 SIN 阈值中的听觉因素:SRT。相关分析表明,听力损失持续时间(dHL)与 SIN 阈值相关。更好的工作记忆能力与 SIN 和 SRT 分数相关。LDT 反应时间与 SRT 分数呈正相关。在 CVC 或 DIN 分数与预测变量之间未发现显著关系。回归分析表明,与 dHL 一起,RSpan 解释了 SIN 阈值变化的 55%。当控制听觉表现时,LA、LDT 和 RSpan 分别与 dHL 一起,分别解释了 SRT 结果的 37%、36%和 46%的变化。结果表明,在 CI 使用者中,较差的言语工作记忆能力,在一定程度上较差的词汇获取能力,限制了他们的语音识别能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19b6/5721962/82528050bb4c/10.1177_2331216517743887-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验