Saieg M A, Barbosa B, Nishi J, Ferrari A, Costa F
Department of Pathology, Santa Casa Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Pathology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Cytopathology. 2018 Apr;29(2):196-200. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12508. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
FNA is a well-established method for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but limitations still reside among non-diagnostic and indeterminate samples. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of repeat FNA in thyroid nodules primarily classified as non-diagnostic and indeterminate, with the evaluation of the diagnostic resolution rate after the reassessment of the nodule.
We retrospectively collected all cases of thyroid FNA at our institution in the last 5 years that had one or more repeat aspirations of the same nodule, calculating the percentage of samples with change in the diagnostic category. Additional collected data included sex, age and interval between the repeat aspirations.
One hundred and seventy-eight specimens from 167 patients (140 female, 27 male) with a median age of 56 years (range 11-90) were included in the study. Among the 86 cases primarily classified as non-diagnostic, 25 (29.1%) remained in the same category after the first reassessment and only 18 (20.9%) after the second repeat aspiration. Among the 40 indeterminate cases, only 10 (25%) retained their status after the second aspiration, with no change after the third assessment.
Repeat aspiration of non-diagnostic and indeterminate thyroid nodules had a positive impact in both groups, with diagnostic resolution rates of 80% and 75%, respectively. The present study therefore endorses the use of such strategy for the initial follow-up of nodules with no definite diagnosis, especially in low-resource centres with limited access to modern molecular technologies.
细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNA)是甲状腺结节术前诊断的常用方法,但在非诊断性和不确定样本中仍存在局限性。本研究的目的是评估重复FNA对主要分类为非诊断性和不确定的甲状腺结节的影响,并在重新评估结节后评估诊断分辨率。
我们回顾性收集了本机构过去5年中所有甲状腺FNA病例,这些病例对同一结节进行了一次或多次重复穿刺,计算诊断类别发生变化的样本百分比。另外收集的数据包括性别、年龄和重复穿刺之间的间隔时间。
本研究纳入了167例患者(140例女性,27例男性)的178份标本,中位年龄为56岁(范围11 - 90岁)。在最初分类为非诊断性的86例病例中,25例(29.1%)在首次重新评估后仍处于同一类别,第二次重复穿刺后仅18例(20.9%)。在40例不确定病例中,第二次穿刺后只有10例(25%)保持其状态,第三次评估后无变化。
对非诊断性和不确定的甲状腺结节进行重复穿刺对两组都有积极影响,诊断分辨率分别为80%和75%。因此,本研究支持对未明确诊断的结节进行初始随访时采用这种策略,特别是在难以获得现代分子技术的资源有限的中心。