aDepartment of Cardiac SurgerybDepartment of Clinical CardiologycHeart Failure Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 Jan;19(1):22-28. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000608.
Ring annuloplasty is the gold standard of surgical repair in degenerative mitral valve disease. However, prosthetic annuloplasty has some drawbacks and potential hazards. Suture annuloplasty theoretically is able to preserve annular leaflet dynamics and left ventricular performance, but experience is limited. The aim of the study was to review the early and long-term outcome of the posterior double-suture annuloplasty (DSA) technique for degenerative mitral valve repair.
From January 2002 to December 2008, 400 patients underwent primary mitral valve repair for degenerative disease either with posterior DSA [n = 147 (37%)] or with flexible posterior annuloplasty band [n = 253 (63%)]. Differences in patient characteristics were addressed by propensity-score matching (132 pairs). A composite end-point of mitral valve failure (MVF) was calculated as the incidence of mitral valve regurgitation greater than 2+ or need for mitral valve replacement at follow-up.
After propensity-score matching, the distribution of preoperative variables among matched pairs was, on average, equal. Isolated annuloplasty and leaflet repair techniques were similarly performed in both groups (P = 0.20). In-hospital mortality was comparable between the two study groups (P = 0.48). Predischarge echocardiography showed excellent results regarding valve hemodynamics (P = 0.71). At a mean follow-up of 11 ± 3 years, all-cause mortality (P = 0.12), need for mitral valve replacement (P = 0.49), and cardiac re-hospitalization rate (P = 0.57) resulted comparable between the two groups. Ten-year survival (75 vs. 71%, P = 0.51) and freedom from MVF (92 vs. 84%, P = 0.39) were similar between posterior annuloplasty band and DSA groups.
Suture annuloplasty demonstrated comparable results with posterior flexible band repair and could be a viable option for mitral valve surgery in selected patients, such as in the minimally invasive approach, in endocarditis, and in developing countries.
瓣环成形术是退行性二尖瓣疾病手术修复的金标准。然而,人工瓣环成形术存在一些缺点和潜在的危险。缝线瓣环成形术理论上能够保持瓣环叶的动力学和左心室功能,但经验有限。本研究旨在回顾后瓣双缝线瓣环成形术(DSA)治疗退行性二尖瓣修复的早期和长期结果。
2002 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月,400 例患者因退行性疾病行二尖瓣修复术,其中后瓣 DSA[147 例(37%)]或后瓣软带瓣环成形术[253 例(63%)]。通过倾向评分匹配(132 对)解决患者特征的差异。复合终点为二尖瓣功能障碍(MVF),定义为随访时二尖瓣反流程度大于 2+或需要二尖瓣置换。
在进行倾向评分匹配后,匹配对中术前变量的分布平均相等。两组均采用单纯瓣环成形术和瓣叶修复技术(P=0.20)。两组住院死亡率相当(P=0.48)。出院前超声心动图显示瓣膜血流动力学结果良好(P=0.71)。平均随访 11±3 年后,两组全因死亡率(P=0.12)、二尖瓣置换需求(P=0.49)和心脏再入院率(P=0.57)相当。10 年生存率(75%比 71%,P=0.51)和 MVF 无事件生存率(92%比 84%,P=0.39)在瓣环成形带和 DSA 两组间相似。
缝线瓣环成形术与后瓣软带修复术的结果相当,对于某些特定患者(如微创入路、心内膜炎和发展中国家),可作为二尖瓣手术的一种可行选择。