Suppr超能文献

基于药学干预对成人糖尿病控制和管理的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of Pharmacy-Based Interventions on the Control and Management of Diabetes in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;41(6):628-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.09.014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of pharmacy-based interventions on clinical outcomes associated with diabetes-related complications as well as on nonclinical outcomes in people with diabetes.

METHODS

We searched 4 main databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) for studies that considered clinical and nonclinical outcomes of pharmacy-based interventions among people with diabetes. Clinical outcomes included patients' mean reductions of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels and body mass indexes (BMIs). Nonclinical outcomes included patients' healthcare utilization and quality of life. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled net mean difference in clinical outcomes between the pharmacy-intervention and the control groups.

RESULTS

Of the 44 studies included in the systematic review, 32 studies reported results from randomized controlled trials measuring reductions of A1C levels in 4,132 patients. Meta-analysis revealed that the standardized absolute mean difference in reduction of A1C levels from baseline to the time of the last follow up significantly favoured the pharmacy intervention versus the control group (0.96%; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.22; p<0.001). Of the studies, 13 reported BMI kg/m in 1,827 patients. The estimation of standardized absolute mean difference in reduction of BMI unit calculated through meta-analysis was 0.61 (95% CI 0.20 to 1.03; p=0.000) in favour of the pharmacy-intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacy-based interventions have significant positive effects on controlling 2 major risks factors associated with diabetes-related complications: A1C levels and BMI. However, there is a dearth of evidence about the effects of pharmacy-based intervention on nonclinical outcomes, including healthcare utilization and quality of life.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估基于药学的干预措施对糖尿病相关并发症相关临床结局以及糖尿病患者非临床结局的影响。

方法

我们检索了 4 个主要数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库),以获取考虑了基于药学的干预措施对糖尿病患者临床和非临床结局影响的研究。临床结局包括患者糖化血红蛋白(A1C)水平和体重指数(BMI)的平均降低情况。非临床结局包括患者的医疗保健利用和生活质量。进行荟萃分析以估计药学干预组与对照组之间临床结局的净平均差异。

结果

在纳入的 44 项系统评价研究中,有 32 项研究报告了 4132 名患者的 A1C 水平降低的随机对照试验结果。荟萃分析显示,从基线到最后一次随访的 A1C 水平降低的标准化绝对平均差异,药学干预组明显优于对照组(0.96%;95%CI 0.71 至 1.22;p<0.001)。其中 13 项研究报告了 1827 名患者的 BMI kg/m。通过荟萃分析估计的 BMI 单位降低的标准化绝对平均差异为 0.61(95%CI 0.20 至 1.03;p=0.000),有利于药学干预组。

结论

基于药学的干预措施对控制与糖尿病相关并发症相关的 2 个主要风险因素 A1C 水平和 BMI 具有显著的积极影响。然而,关于基于药学的干预对非临床结局(包括医疗保健利用和生活质量)的影响,证据不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验