Suppr超能文献

[不同疗法对面肌痉挛疗效的比较观察]

[Comparative observation of the efficacy on facial spasm among different therapies].

作者信息

Zhang Lili, Zhao Lei, Bai Ying

机构信息

Rehabilitation Department of Hulun Buir Municipal People's Hospital, Hulun Buir 021008, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

Department of Chinese Medicine, Hailar Nongken General Hospital, Hulun Buir 021008, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Jan 12;37(1):35-38. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.01.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the differences in the clinical efficacy on facial spasm among auricular acupuncture, acupuncture and western medication.

METHODS

Ninety cases of facial spasm were randomized into an auricular acupuncture group, an acupuncture group and a western medication group, 30 cases in each one. In the auricular acupuncture group, yan (LO), shenmen (TF), xin (CO), gan (CO), pi (CO), pizhixia (AT), chuiqian (LO), and zhen (AT) were selected. In the acupuncture group, Baihui (GV 20), Fengchi (GB 20), Sibai (ST 2), Xiaguan (ST 7), Chengqi (ST 1), Hegu (LI 4), Taichong (LR 3) and Zusanli (ST 36) were selected. The needling therapy was given once a day in these two groups and 5 treatments as one session. There were 2 days at intervals. Totally two sessions were required. In the western medication group, carbamazepine tablets were prescribed for oral administration, 0.1 g each time, three times a day, for 7 days as one session, and totally 2 sessions were required. The facial spasmodic intensity was observed before and after treatment in the three groups. The effects were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

After treatment, the facial spasmodic intensity was reduced as compared with that before treatment in all of the three groups (all <0.05). The result in the auricular acupuncture group was better than the other two groups (both <0.05). The result in the acupuncture group was better than that in the western medication group (<0.05). The total effective rates were 93.3% (28/30), 80.0% (24/30) and 53.3% (16/30) in the three groups separately. The efficacy in the auricular acupuncture group was better than either the acupuncture group or the western medication group (both <0.05). The result in the acupuncture group was better than that in the western medication group (<0.05). The efficacy in the cases with the diseases duration less than 6 months was significantly better than that in the cases with the diseases duration over 6 months (all <0.05). What's more, the efficacy of the auricular acupuncture group were the best.

CONCLUSIONS

The auricular acupuncture is quite optimal in the treatment of facial spasm. Its efficacy is better than that of routine acupuncture and carbamazepine. The efficacy is especially better in the cases with the diseases duration less than 6 months.

摘要

目的

比较耳针、体针及西药治疗面肌痉挛的临床疗效差异。

方法

将90例面肌痉挛患者随机分为耳针组、体针组和西药组,每组30例。耳针组选取耳穴眼(LO)、神门(TF)、心(CO)、肝(CO)、脾(CO)、皮质下(AT)、垂前(LO)、枕(AT);体针组选取百会(GV 20)、风池(GB 20)、四白(ST 2)、下关(ST 7)、承泣(ST 1)、合谷(LI 4)、太冲(LR 3)、足三里(ST 36)。两组均每日针刺治疗1次,5次为1个疗程,疗程间间隔2天,共治疗2个疗程。西药组口服卡马西平片,每次0.1 g,每日3次,7天为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程。观察三组治疗前后面肌痉挛强度,并比较三组疗效。

结果

三组治疗后面肌痉挛强度均较治疗前降低(均P<0.05)。耳针组疗效优于其他两组(均P<0.05);体针组疗效优于西药组(P<0.05)。三组总有效率分别为93.3%(28/30)、80.0%(24/30)、53.3%(l6/30),耳针组疗效优于体针组和西药组(均P<0.05),体针组疗效优于西药组(P<0.05)。病程<6个月患者的疗效明显优于病程>6个月患者(均P<0.05),且耳针组疗效最佳。

结论

耳针治疗面肌痉挛疗效显著,其疗效优于常规针刺及卡马西平,对病程<6个月的患者疗效更佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验