Suppr超能文献

牙科中的口内扫描仪:当前文献综述

Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.

作者信息

Mangano Francesco, Gandolfi Andrea, Luongo Giuseppe, Logozzo Silvia

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Dental School, University of Varese, Varese, Italy.

Private Practice, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoral scanners (IOS) are devices for capturing direct optical impressions in dentistry. The purpose of this narrative review on the use of IOS was to: (1) identify the advantages/disadvantages of using optical impressions compared to conventional impressions; (2) investigate if optical impressions are as accurate as conventional impressions; (3) evaluate the differences between the IOS currently available commercially; (4) determine the current clinical applications/limitations in the use of IOS.

METHODS

Electronic database searches were performed using specific keywords and MeSH terms. The searches were confined to full-text articles written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2007 and June 2017.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two studies were included in the present review; among them, 20 were previous literature reviews, 78 were in vivo clinical studies (6 randomized controlled/crossover trials, 31 controlled/comparative studies; 24 cohort studies/case series; 17 case reports) and 34 were in vitro comparative studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Optical impressions reduce patient discomfort; IOS are time-efficient and simplify clinical procedures for the dentist, eliminating plaster models and allowing better communication with the dental technician and with patients; however, with IOS, it can be difficult to detect deep margin lines in prepared teeth and/or in case of bleeding, there is a learning curve, and there are purchasing and managing costs. The current IOS are sufficiently accurate for capturing impressions for fabricating a whole series of prosthetic restorations (inlays/onlays, copings and frameworks, single crowns and fixed partial dentures) on both natural teeth and implants; in addition, they can be used for smile design, and to fabricate posts and cores, removable partial prostheses and obturators. The literature to date does not support the use of IOS in long-span restorations with natural teeth or implants. Finally, IOS can be integrated in implant dentistry for guided surgery and in orthodontics for fabricating aligners and custom-made devices.

摘要

背景

口腔内扫描仪(IOS)是牙科中用于获取直接光学印模的设备。本叙述性综述关于IOS使用的目的是:(1)确定与传统印模相比使用光学印模的优缺点;(2)研究光学印模是否与传统印模一样准确;(3)评估目前市场上可用的IOS之间的差异;(4)确定IOS使用中的当前临床应用/局限性。

方法

使用特定关键词和医学主题词进行电子数据库检索。检索限于2007年1月至2017年6月期间发表在同行评审期刊上的英文全文文章。

结果

本综述纳入了132项研究;其中,20项为先前的文献综述,78项为体内临床研究(6项随机对照/交叉试验、31项对照/比较研究、24项队列研究/病例系列、17项病例报告),34项为体外比较研究。

结论

光学印模可减轻患者不适;IOS省时且简化了牙医的临床操作,无需石膏模型,并能更好地与牙科技师和患者沟通;然而,使用IOS时,在预备牙中检测深边缘线可能困难,和/或在出血情况下存在学习曲线,并且有购买和管理成本。当前的IOS对于获取用于在天然牙和种植体上制作全系列修复体(嵌体/高嵌体、 coping和框架、单冠和固定局部义齿)的印模足够准确;此外,它们可用于微笑设计,以及制作桩核、可摘局部义齿和阻塞器。迄今为止的文献不支持在天然牙或种植体的长跨度修复中使用IOS。最后,IOS可集成到种植牙科中用于引导手术,以及在正畸中用于制作矫治器和定制装置。

相似文献

1
Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.
2
ACCURACY OF INTRAORAL SCANNERS VERSUS TRADITIONAL IMPRESSIONS: A RAPID UMBRELLA REVIEW.
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022 Sep;22(3):101719. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101719. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Aug 30;26(3):101-121. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01752Abduo21.
6
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4.
7
Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6517-6531. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04157-3. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
J Prosthodont. 2009 Oct;18(7):582-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00493.x. Epub 2009 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

3
Three-Dimensionally Printed Splints in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;13(7):312. doi: 10.3390/dj13070312.
6
Accuracy of the digital implant impression with splinted and non-splinted intraoral scan bodies: A systematic review.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jan 1;25(1):3-12. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_261_24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Feb;119(2):225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
5
Chairside systems: a current review.
Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(2):123-149.
6
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4.
8
Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners.
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Oct;61(4):450-459. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 May;78(3):211-220. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0070-0. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
10
Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1360-1367. doi: 10.1111/clr.12994. Epub 2016 Dec 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验