Suppr超能文献

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的分子分型:基于聚合酶链反应的开放阅读框分型、多位点序列分型及葡萄球菌蛋白A基因分型的比较

Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of PCR-based open reading frame typing, multilocus sequence typing, and Staphylococcus protein A gene typing.

作者信息

Ogihara Shinji, Saito Ryoichi, Sawabe Etsuko, Kozakai Takahiro, Shima Mari, Aiso Yoshibumi, Fujie Toshihide, Nukui Yoko, Koike Ryuji, Hagihara Michio, Tohda Shuji

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Infect Chemother. 2018 Apr;24(4):312-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

Abstract

The recently developed PCR-based open reading frame typing (POT) method is a useful molecular typing tool. Here, we evaluated the performance of POT for molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates and compared its performance to those of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and Staphylococcus protein A gene typing (spa typing). Thirty-seven MRSA isolates were collected between July 2012 and May 2015. MLST, spa typing, and POT were performed, and their discriminatory powers were evaluated using Simpson's index analysis. The MRSA isolates were classified into 11, 18, and 33 types by MLST, spa typing, and POT, respectively. The predominant strains identified by MLST, spa typing, and POT were ST8 and ST764, t002, and 93-191-127, respectively. The discriminatory power of MLST, spa typing, and POT was 0.853, 0.875, and 0.992, respectively, indicating that POT had the highest discriminatory power. Moreover, the results of MLST and spa were available after 2 days, whereas that of POT was available in 5 h. Furthermore, POT is rapid and easy to perform and interpret. Therefore, POT is a superior molecular typing tool for monitoring nosocomial transmission of MRSA.

摘要

最近开发的基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的开放阅读框分型(POT)方法是一种有用的分子分型工具。在此,我们评估了POT对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)分离株进行分子分型的性能,并将其性能与多位点序列分型(MLST)和葡萄球菌蛋白A基因分型(spa分型)的性能进行了比较。2012年7月至2015年5月期间收集了37株MRSA分离株。进行了MLST、spa分型和POT,并使用辛普森指数分析评估了它们的鉴别能力。通过MLST、spa分型和POT分别将MRSA分离株分为11、18和33种类型。通过MLST、spa分型和POT鉴定出的主要菌株分别为ST8和ST764、t002以及93 - 191 - 127。MLST、spa分型和POT的鉴别能力分别为0.853、0.875和0.992,表明POT具有最高的鉴别能力。此外,MLST和spa分型的结果在2天后可得,而POT的结果在5小时内即可获得。而且,POT快速且易于操作和解读。因此,POT是监测MRSA医院内传播的一种优越的分子分型工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验