Steele Rose, Davies Betty, Krueger Guenther
1 School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 School of Nursing, 8205 University of Victoria , Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Can J Nurs Res. 2018 Mar;50(1):37-44. doi: 10.1177/0844562117747185. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
The complexity of qualitative research can lead to a less thorough analysis than would be ideal. Even experienced researchers can become entwined in the myriad of decisions that must be made. Descriptions of qualitative approaches in numerous textbooks and published articles often lack sufficient details to help a researcher surface from the entanglements, especially when conducting studies in clinical settings. In this paper, we share our experiences of navigating some "real-world" issues in doing qualitative research. We describe five key, practical recommendations to assist researchers in preventing, or at least alleviating, some of the challenges that researchers may face, particularly ones that limit in-depth analysis: (1) conduct a pilot study, (2) hire a research analyst, (3) engage the "right" team, (4) attend to team cohesion, and (5) conduct conceptual analysis through a process of "node expansion."
定性研究的复杂性可能导致分析不如理想情况下那样深入透彻。即使是经验丰富的研究人员也可能陷入必须做出的无数决策之中。众多教科书和已发表文章中对定性研究方法的描述往往缺乏足够细节,难以帮助研究人员摆脱困境,尤其是在临床环境中开展研究时。在本文中,我们分享在进行定性研究时应对一些“现实世界”问题的经验。我们描述了五条关键的实用建议,以帮助研究人员预防或至少减轻研究人员可能面临的一些挑战,特别是那些限制深入分析的挑战:(1)进行预试验;(2)聘请研究分析师;(3)组建“合适的”团队;(4)关注团队凝聚力;(5)通过“节点扩展”过程进行概念分析。