Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Taoyuan, Taiwan.
From the Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine; Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and the Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, and the Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4):865-877. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004204.
Numerous techniques are used to prevent infection after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly prescribed to decrease the risk of reconstructive failure, despite conflicting evidence regarding its effectiveness. The authors studied whether postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of infection-related explantation in the setting of immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction.
Using Truven MarketScan databases, the authors identified all patients who underwent immediate implant reconstruction between January of 2010 and June of 2014 with at least 6 months of follow-up. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was defined as any oral antibiotic course to be taken postoperatively based on prescriptions filled within 14 days preoperatively through 24 hours after discharge. Reconstructive failure, defined as explantation because of infection, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes of interest included wound complications, infection, and readmission for infection. Multivariable regression analyses controlled for demographic variables/comorbidities.
Of the 7443 patients, 6049 (81 percent) filled prescriptions for postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. These patients were equally likely to develop a wound complication (OR, 0.93; 95 percent CI, 0.71 to 1.23) or infection (OR, 0.89; 95 percent CI, 0.70 to 1.14), undergo explantation because of infection (OR, 0.82; 95 percent CI, 0.57 to 1.18), or require readmission for infection (OR, 1.21; 95 percent CI, 0.82 to 1.78) compared with those who did not receive antibiotics. There was no significant difference in the risk of infection-related outcomes based on postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis duration.
Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with a reduced risk of infection or explantation following prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. Given rising rates of antibiotic resistance, focusing instead on technical considerations and the management of comorbid conditions may more effectively enhance the safety of breast reconstruction.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
在即刻基于植入物的乳房重建后,使用了许多技术来预防感染。尽管关于其有效性的证据存在冲突,但术后抗生素预防仍被常规开具以降低重建失败的风险。作者研究了在即刻假体乳房重建的情况下,术后抗生素预防是否会降低感染相关假体取出的风险。
作者使用 Truven MarketScan 数据库,确定了 2010 年 1 月至 2014 年 6 月期间接受即刻植入物重建且至少有 6 个月随访的所有患者。术后抗生素预防被定义为根据术前 14 天内至出院后 24 小时内开出的处方,术后服用的任何口服抗生素疗程。主要结局是因感染而进行的假体取出。感兴趣的次要结局包括伤口并发症、感染和因感染再次入院。多变量回归分析控制了人口统计学变量/合并症。
在 7443 名患者中,有 6049 名(81%)开具了术后抗生素预防的处方。这些患者发生伤口并发症(OR,0.93;95%CI,0.71 至 1.23)或感染(OR,0.89;95%CI,0.70 至 1.14)、因感染进行假体取出(OR,0.82;95%CI,0.57 至 1.18)或因感染再次入院(OR,1.21;95%CI,0.82 至 1.78)的可能性与未接受抗生素的患者相同。根据术后抗生素预防持续时间,感染相关结局的风险没有显著差异。
在假体乳房重建后,术后抗生素预防与感染或假体取出的风险降低无关。鉴于抗生素耐药率的上升,专注于技术考虑因素和合并症的管理可能更有效地提高乳房重建的安全性。
临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,III 级。