Volz Katja, Bahr Lisa-Marie, Heinrichs Markus, Vaitl Dieter, Ambach Wolfgang
Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health, Wilhelmstraße 3a, D-79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Laboratory for Biological and Personality Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Straße 8, D- 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Sep;63(5):1419-1428. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13718. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
An approach toward detecting hidden knowledge is the Concealed Information Test (CIT). It relies on the memory of crime-relevant information. This study investigated whether its validity is susceptible to memory distortion by misleading information. A misleading information paradigm was employed to distort memory prior to an interrogation with a CIT. Forty-one participants watched a video with specific crime-related information. After a 1-week retention interval, misleading information was introduced. Afterward, a CIT was performed, followed by a threefold memory test. When misleading information was presented, memory performance was reduced, and no physiological response differences between crime-relevant and crime-irrelevant information were found. Without presenting misleading information, physiological responses differed between responses to crime-relevant and crime-irrelevant information. However, responses in all physiological measures also differed between misleading and irrelevant information. The results indicate that the CIT is susceptible to misleading information, which reduces its validity in specific constellations.
一种检测隐藏知识的方法是隐蔽信息测试(CIT)。它依赖于对与犯罪相关信息的记忆。本研究调查了其有效性是否容易受到误导性信息导致的记忆扭曲的影响。采用误导性信息范式在使用CIT进行讯问之前扭曲记忆。41名参与者观看了一段包含特定犯罪相关信息的视频。在1周的保留期后,引入了误导性信息。之后,进行了CIT,随后进行了三重记忆测试。当呈现误导性信息时,记忆表现下降,并且未发现与犯罪相关和与犯罪无关信息之间的生理反应差异。在不呈现误导性信息的情况下,对与犯罪相关和与犯罪无关信息的反应之间存在生理反应差异。然而,在误导性信息和无关信息之间,所有生理测量的反应也存在差异。结果表明,CIT容易受到误导性信息的影响,这在特定情况下会降低其有效性。