• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚 HPV 疫苗接种和未接种女性中基于 HPV 的细胞学筛查与初级 HPV 检测的比较:国家宫颈癌筛查计划的有效性和经济评估。

Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.

机构信息

Cancer Council NSW, Cancer Research Division, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Cancer Council NSW, Cancer Research Division, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e96-e107. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5
PMID:29253402
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Australia's National Cervical Screening Program currently recommends cytological screening every 2 years for women aged 18-69 years. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was implemented in 2007 with high population coverage, and falls in high-grade lesions in young women have been reported extensively. This decline prompted a major review of the National Cervical Screening Program and new clinical management guidelines, for which we undertook this analysis.

METHODS

We did effectiveness modelling and an economic assessment of potential new screening strategies, using a model of HPV transmission, vaccination, natural history, and cervical screening. First, we evaluated 132 screening strategies, including those based on cytology and primary HPV testing. Second, after a recommendation was made to adopt primary HPV screening with partial genotyping and direct referral to colposcopy of women positive for HPV16/18, we evaluated the final effect of HPV screening after incorporating new clinical guidelines for women positive for HPV. Both evaluations considered both unvaccinated and vaccinated cohorts.

FINDINGS

Strategies entailing HPV testing every 5 years and either partial genotyping for HPV16/18 or cytological co-testing were the most effective. One of the most effective and cost-effective strategies comprised primary HPV screening with referral of women positive for oncogenic HPV16/18 direct to colposcopy, with reflex cytological triage for women with other oncogenic types and direct referral for those in this group with high-grade cytological findings. After incorporating detailed clinical guidelines recommendations, this strategy is predicted to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality by 31% and 36%, respectively, in unvaccinated cohorts, and by 24% and 29%, respectively, in cohorts offered vaccination. Furthermore, this strategy is predicted to reduce costs by up to 19% for unvaccinated cohorts and 26% for cohorts offered vaccination, compared with the current programme.

INTERPRETATION

Primary HPV screening every 5 years with partial genotyping is predicted to be substantially more effective and potentially cost-saving compared with the current cytology-based screening programme undertaken every 2 years. These findings underpin the decision to transition to primary HPV screening with partial genotyping in the Australian National Cervical Screening Program, which will occur in May, 2017.

FUNDING

Department of Health, Australia.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚国家宫颈癌筛查计划目前建议 18-69 岁的女性每 2 年进行细胞学筛查。人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗于 2007 年实施,具有较高的人群覆盖率,并广泛报道了年轻女性中高级别病变的下降。这种下降促使对国家宫颈癌筛查计划进行了重大审查,并制定了新的临床管理指南,我们为此进行了这项分析。

方法

我们使用 HPV 传播、疫苗接种、自然史和宫颈癌筛查模型,对潜在的新筛查策略进行了有效性建模和经济评估。首先,我们评估了 132 种筛查策略,包括细胞学和初级 HPV 检测。其次,在建议采用初级 HPV 筛查结合 HPV16/18 部分基因分型和直接转诊行阴道镜检查后,我们评估了 HPV 筛查在纳入 HPV 阳性女性新临床指南后的最终效果。这两种评估都考虑了未接种疫苗和接种疫苗的队列。

结果

每 5 年进行一次 HPV 检测的策略,以及 HPV16/18 部分基因分型或细胞学联合检测的策略,是最有效的。最有效和最具成本效益的策略之一是对 HPV 阳性女性直接转诊行阴道镜检查,对其他致癌 HPV 阳性女性进行细胞学三重试验,并对该组中高级别细胞学发现的女性直接转诊。在纳入详细的临床指南建议后,该策略预计可将未接种疫苗队列的宫颈癌发病率和死亡率分别降低 31%和 36%,而接种疫苗队列则分别降低 24%和 29%。此外,与现行方案相比,该策略预计可使未接种疫苗队列的成本降低 19%,接种疫苗队列的成本降低 26%。

解释

与目前每 2 年进行一次的基于细胞学的筛查方案相比,每 5 年进行一次的初级 HPV 筛查结合部分基因分型被预测具有更高的有效性,并且具有潜在的成本节约。这些发现为澳大利亚国家宫颈癌筛查计划向初级 HPV 筛查结合部分基因分型过渡的决策提供了依据,该计划将于 2017 年 5 月实施。

资助

澳大利亚卫生部。

相似文献

1
Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.澳大利亚 HPV 疫苗接种和未接种女性中基于 HPV 的细胞学筛查与初级 HPV 检测的比较:国家宫颈癌筛查计划的有效性和经济评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e96-e107. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
2
Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.宫颈癌筛查中初级人乳头瘤病毒检测的最佳管理策略:澳大利亚国家宫颈癌筛查计划的成本效益评估
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0163509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163509. eCollection 2017.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
4
How will transitioning from cytology to HPV testing change the balance between the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening? Estimates of the impact on cervical cancer, treatment rates and adverse obstetric outcomes in Australia, a high vaccination coverage country.细胞学检测向 HPV 检测转变将如何改变宫颈癌筛查的获益与危害平衡?对澳大利亚(高疫苗接种率国家)宫颈癌、治疗率和不良产科结局影响的评估。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;141(12):2410-2422. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30926. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
5
Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.指南针研究方案:一项针对澳大利亚25至69岁未接种和已接种HPV疫苗女性的宫颈癌初级HPV检测与细胞学筛查的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e016700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016700.
6
Cervical cancer prevention in Australia: Planning for the future.澳大利亚的宫颈癌预防:未来规划
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Apr;124(4):235-40. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21643. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in the context of routine HPV vaccination by optimizing screening strategies with respect to vaccine uptake: a modeling analysis.在常规 HPV 疫苗接种的背景下,通过优化疫苗接种率相关的筛查策略来实现宫颈癌筛查的成本效益最大化:建模分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 10;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02748-3.
8
Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗女性的最佳宫颈癌筛查
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 18;109(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw216. Print 2017 Feb.
9
The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚消除宫颈癌的预计时间框架:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jan;4(1):e19-e27. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30183-X. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
10
The combined impact of implementing HPV immunisation and primary HPV screening in New Zealand: Transitional and long-term benefits, costs and resource utilisation implications.新西兰实施 HPV 免疫接种和初级 HPV 筛查的综合影响:过渡和长期效益、成本和资源利用的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;152(3):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.045.

引用本文的文献

1
Human papillomavirus-associated anal cancer, vulvar verrucous cancer, and cervical cancer in a post-renal transplant patient-a case report.肾移植术后患者发生人乳头瘤病毒相关的肛门癌、外阴疣状癌和宫颈癌——病例报告
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 4;15:1579795. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1579795. eCollection 2025.
2
Recent Advances in HPV Detection: From Traditional Methods to Nanotechnology and the Application of Quantum Dots.人乳头瘤病毒检测的最新进展:从传统方法到纳米技术及量子点的应用
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 May 21;20:6333-6356. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S524518. eCollection 2025.
3
Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of High-Risk HPV Genotypes Among Women in Greece: A Retrospective Analysis of 3500 Women.
希腊女性高危型人乳头瘤病毒基因型的流行率及基因型分布:对3500名女性的回顾性分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;17(8):1267. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081267.
4
Barriers of organized cervical cancer screening in Albania and Montenegro.阿尔巴尼亚和黑山有组织的宫颈癌筛查的障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):1533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22535-4.
5
Cervical cancer screening by cotesting method for Vietnamese women 25-55 years old: a cost-effectiveness analysis.越南25至55岁女性联合检测法宫颈癌筛查的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):e082145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082145.
6
Digital CRISPR-Powered Biosensor Concept without Target Amplification Using Single-Impact Electrochemistry.数字 CRISPR 无靶标扩增的单冲击电化学生物传感器概念。
ACS Sens. 2024 Nov 22;9(11):6197-6206. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.4c02060. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
7
Building Capacity for Cervical Cancer Prevention in U.S.-Affiliated Pacific Islands: The Pacific Against Cervical Cancer Project.提升美国附属太平洋岛屿地区宫颈癌预防能力:太平洋防治宫颈癌项目。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Jul;33(7):839-847. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0284. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Cervical cancer: Challenges and prevention strategies: A narrative review.宫颈癌:挑战与预防策略:一篇叙述性综述
Health Sci Rep. 2024 May 30;7(6):e2149. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2149. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cervical screening, triage and treatment strategies for women in the general population.普通人群中女性宫颈筛查、分流和治疗策略的获益、危害和成本效益。
Nat Med. 2023 Dec;29(12):3050-3058. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02600-4. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
10
Benefits and harms of prostate specific antigen testing according to Australian guidelines.根据澳大利亚指南,前列腺特异性抗原检测的获益和危害。
Int J Cancer. 2024 Feb 15;154(4):648-658. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34731. Epub 2023 Oct 11.