Shah Swikant, Rath Hemamalini, Sharma Gaurav
Department of Public Health Dentistry, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Indian J Dent Res. 2017 Nov-Dec;28(6):629-636. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_231_17.
Dental institutions provide very good platform to educate budding dentists to inculcate the habit of tobacco cessation counseling, including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).
The aim of this study is to assess and compare the knowledge, attitude, and practice of institutionally attached postgraduate students and faculty members of the dental profession toward NRT.
For a cross-sectional survey among 201 participants from four dental colleges in Odisha, India, a 28-item questionnaire was developed, subdivided into four categories: demographic details, assessment of NRT knowledge (21-item), assessment of attitude (5-item), practice (1-item with 4 subgroup questions), and 1-item assessing barriers.
Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and multiple logistic regression.
Only one-third of participants were aware of the dosage, mechanism of action, pharmacology, duration of the prescription, brand name, side effects, contraindications, and availability. Around two-third of participants who claimed to practice NRT, agreed to follow up the patients whom they prescribed NRT. Half of the study participants reported that they do not keep a record of these patients. Around 10% of respondents practicing NRT were confident enough to practice it without facing any problem. Major barriers for practicing NRT was found to be a lack of awareness (54.22%) followed by availability and bitter taste. The total knowledge score was found to be the strongest predictor of practicing NRT in multiple logistic regression.
Lack of detailed knowledge regarding NRT reduces the chance of practicing inspite of having a positive attitude among institutionally attached dentists.
牙科机构为培养初露头角的牙医灌输戒烟咨询习惯(包括尼古丁替代疗法,NRT)提供了很好的平台。
本研究的目的是评估和比较牙科专业的机构附属研究生和教职员工对NRT的知识、态度和实践。
针对印度奥里萨邦四所牙科学院的201名参与者进行横断面调查,编制了一份包含28个条目的问卷,分为四类:人口统计学细节、NRT知识评估(21个条目)、态度评估(5个条目)、实践(1个条目及4个亚组问题)以及1个评估障碍的条目。
使用描述性统计、卡方检验和多元逻辑回归分析数据。
只有三分之一的参与者了解NRT的剂量、作用机制、药理学、处方时长、品牌名称、副作用、禁忌症和可获得性。约三分之二声称实施NRT的参与者同意对他们开了NRT处方的患者进行随访。一半的研究参与者报告说他们没有记录这些患者的情况。约10%实施NRT的受访者有足够信心实施且不会遇到任何问题。发现实施NRT的主要障碍是缺乏认识(54.22%),其次是可获得性和苦味。在多元逻辑回归中,总知识得分被发现是实施NRT的最强预测因素。
尽管机构附属牙医态度积极,但对NRT缺乏详细了解降低了实施的可能性。