Suppr超能文献

联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分阶段肝切除术与传统两阶段肝切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy versus conventional two-stage hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec 19;15(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1295-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is generally accepted that an insufficient future liver remnant is a major limitation of large-scale hepatectomy for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is commonly considered to accelerate future liver regeneration despite its low regeneration rate. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), which is characterized by a rapid regeneration, has brought new opportunities.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by searching the selected databases up to September 2017. Then, a meta-analysis of regeneration efficiency, complication rate, R0 resection ratio, and short-term outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies, comprising 719 patients, were included. The overall analysis showed that ALPPS was associated with a larger hyperplastic volume and a shorter time interval (P < 0.00001) than TSH. ALPPS also exhibited a higher completion rate for second-stage operations (odds ratio, OR 9.50; P < 0.0001) and a slightly higher rate of R0 resection (OR 1.90; P = 0.11). Interestingly, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between the two treatments (OR 1.44; P = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that compared with TSH, ALPPS possesses a stronger regenerative ability and better facilitates second-stage operations. However, the safety, patient outcomes, and patient selection for ALPPS require further study.

摘要

背景

人们普遍认为,对于原发性肝细胞癌患者,肝剩余量不足是大规模肝切除术的主要限制。尽管常规两阶段肝切除术(TSH)的再生率较低,但仍被认为可以加速未来的肝脏再生。联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分阶段肝切除术(ALPPS)以快速再生为特征,带来了新的机会。

方法

通过搜索选定的数据库,截至 2017 年 9 月,确定了相关研究。然后,对再生效率、并发症发生率、R0 切除率和短期结果进行了荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了 10 项研究,共 719 例患者。总体分析表明,与 TSH 相比,ALPPS 具有更大的增生体积和更短的时间间隔(P < 0.00001)。ALPPS 还显示出更高的二期手术完成率(比值比,OR 9.50;P < 0.0001)和略高的 R0 切除率(OR 1.90;P = 0.11)。有趣的是,两种治疗方法的 90 天死亡率无显著差异(OR 1.44;P = 0.35)。

结论

这些结果表明,与 TSH 相比,ALPPS 具有更强的再生能力,更有利于二期手术。然而,ALPPS 的安全性、患者结局和患者选择仍需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c14a/5738171/415a24ab33d8/12957_2017_1295_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验