Goh David, de Korne Dirk F, Ho Henrietta, Mathur Ranjana, Chakraborty Bibhas, Van Hai Nguyen, Wai Charity, Perera Shamira, Aung Tin, Wong Tien Y, Lamoureux Ecosse L
Singapore National Eye Centre.
Duke-NUS Medical School.
J Glaucoma. 2018 Feb;27(2):170-175. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000852.
The purpose of this article is to assess the quality of care and economic benefits of a shared care model managing patients with stable glaucoma in a primary eye care (PEC) clinic compared with a tertiary specialist outpatient clinic (SOC) in Singapore.
A randomized equivalence feasibility trial was preformed comparing the PEC with SOC models. Participants recruited from the SOC had no visual field progression or change in management for at least 3 years, were on a maximum of a single glaucoma medication, had no previous tube-shunt implant and were at least 3-year posttrabeculectomy surgery.Primary outcomes were clinical assessment and management, economic benefits, and patient satisfaction. Differences were analyzed using equivalence testing and generalized odds ratios.
The trial included 233 patients, consisting of 42.1% glaucoma disc suspects (PEC: 47.4%; SOC: 36.8%), 27.5% primary angle closure suspects (PEC: 25.0%; SOC: 29.9%), 13.7% with ocular hypertension (PEC: 13.8%; SOC: 13.7%), 3.9% with primary angle closure glaucoma (PEC: 4.3%; SOC: 3.4%), and 3.0% with primary open angle glaucoma (PEC: 1.7%; SOC: 4.3%). Glaucoma clinical care for patients at PEC was as good as SOC [rate difference, 6.83%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.84-11.12) and management (rate difference, 7.69%; 95% CI, 3.21-12.17). In 23 cases (9.9%), 5.2% at PEC and 14.5% at SOC, there was disconcordance with the gold standard of senior consultant. Patient satisfaction at the PEC was equally high when compared with SOC (generalized odds ratio, 1.43; CI, 0.50-2.00). Direct costs per patient visit were 43% lower at PEC compared with SOC.
Managing stable glaucoma patients at a primary care setting is a cost saving, safe, and effective shared care while enhancing professional collaboration between hospital and community settings.
本文旨在评估新加坡一家初级眼科护理(PEC)诊所与一家三级专科门诊(SOC)诊所相比,采用共享护理模式管理稳定期青光眼患者的护理质量和经济效益。
进行了一项随机等效可行性试验,比较PEC模式与SOC模式。从SOC招募的参与者至少3年没有视野进展或治疗方案改变,最多使用一种青光眼药物,以前没有进行过引流管植入手术,且小梁切除术后至少3年。主要结局指标为临床评估与管理、经济效益和患者满意度。使用等效性检验和广义优势比分析差异。
该试验纳入了233例患者,其中42.1%为青光眼可疑视盘患者(PEC:47.4%;SOC:36.8%),27.5%为原发性闭角型青光眼可疑患者(PEC:25.0%;SOC:29.9%),13.7%为高眼压症患者(PEC:13.8%;SOC:13.7%),3.9%为原发性闭角型青光眼患者(PEC:4.3%;SOC:3.4%),3.0%为原发性开角型青光眼患者(PEC:1.7%;SOC:4.3%)。PEC诊所对患者的青光眼临床护理与SOC诊所一样好[率差为6.83%;95%置信区间(CI)为2.84 - 11.12],管理方面也是如此(率差为7.69%;95%CI为3.21 - 12.17)。在23例(9.9%)病例中,PEC诊所为5.2%,SOC诊所为l4.5%,与高级顾问的金标准存在不一致。与SOC诊所相比,PEC诊所的患者满意度同样较高(广义优势比为1.43;CI为0.50 - 2.00)。与SOC诊所相比,PEC诊所每次患者就诊的直接成本低43%。
在初级护理机构管理稳定期青光眼患者是一种节省成本、安全有效的共享护理模式,同时可加强医院和社区机构之间的专业协作。