Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) implies an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and the optimal antithrombotic treatment is not established.
DESIGN, MATERIALS, METHODS: The EUCLID trial investigated the effect of monotherapy with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in 13,885 patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD); the primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischaemic stroke. Patients planned for revascularisation or amputation within 3 months, were excluded. This analysis focuses on the subgroup with CLI, defined by rest pain (58.8%), major (9.0%) or minor (32.2%) tissue loss.
In EUCLID, 643 patients (4.6%) had CLI at baseline. Diabetes mellitus was more common in the CLI group, while coronary disease, carotid disease, and hypertension were more common in the non-CLI group. A majority of CLI patients (62.1%) had only lower extremity PAD. In patients enrolled on the ankle brachial index (ABI) criteria, ABI was 0.55 ± 0.21 (mean ± SD) for those with CLI versus 0.63 ± 0.15 for those without CLI. The primary efficacy endpoint significantly increased among patients with CLI compared with those without CLI with a rate of 8.85 versus 4.28/100 patient years (adjusted for baseline characteristics hazard ratio [HR] 1.43 [95% CI 1.16-1.76]; p = 0.0009). When acute limb ischaemia requiring hospitalisation was added to the model, significant differences remained (adjusted HR 1.38, [95% CI 1.13-1.69]; p = 0.0016). The 1 year mortality was 8.9%. A trend towards increased lower limb revascularisation among those with CLI was observed. Bleeding (TIMI major, fatal, intracranial) did not differ between those with and without CLI.
Nearly 5% of patients enrolled in EUCLID had CLI at baseline. Milder forms of CLI dominated, a result of the trial design. Patients with CLI had a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity versus those without CLI. Further efforts are required to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in PAD, especially in patients with CLI. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01732822.
严重肢体缺血(CLI)意味着心血管发病率和死亡率增加,尚未确定最佳的抗血栓治疗方法。
设计、材料和方法:EUCLID 试验研究了替格瑞洛单药治疗与氯吡格雷在 13885 例外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者中的疗效;主要终点是心血管死亡、心肌梗死或缺血性卒中。计划在 3 个月内行血运重建或截肢的患者被排除在外。本分析重点关注 CLI 亚组,CLI 定义为静息痛(58.8%)、大(9.0%)或小(32.2%)组织损失。
在 EUCLID 中,643 例(4.6%)患者基线时有 CLI。CLI 组中糖尿病更为常见,而非 CLI 组中冠心病、颈动脉疾病和高血压更为常见。大多数 CLI 患者(62.1%)仅有下肢 PAD。在根据踝臂指数(ABI)标准入选的患者中,CLI 患者的 ABI 为 0.55±0.21(平均值±标准差),而非 CLI 患者的 ABI 为 0.63±0.15。与无 CLI 患者相比,CLI 患者的主要疗效终点显著增加,发生率分别为 8.85%和 4.28%/100 患者年(根据基线特征调整后的风险比[HR]1.43[95%CI 1.16-1.76];p=0.0009)。当将需要住院治疗的急性肢体缺血添加到模型中时,差异仍然显著(调整后的 HR 1.38[95%CI 1.13-1.69];p=0.0016)。1 年死亡率为 8.9%。观察到 CLI 患者下肢血运重建率呈上升趋势。CLI 患者与无 CLI 患者的出血(TIMI 主要、致命、颅内)无差异。
EUCLID 入组患者中近 5%在基线时有 CLI。较轻形式的 CLI 占主导地位,这是试验设计的结果。与无 CLI 患者相比,CLI 患者的心血管死亡率和发病率显著更高。需要进一步努力降低 PAD 患者的心血管事件风险,特别是 CLI 患者。CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:NCT01732822。