Yang ShenMiao, Wang Jing, Zhao Ting, Jia JinSong, Zhu HongHu, Jiang Hao, Lu Jin, Jiang Bin, Shi HongXia, Liu YanRong, Lai YueYun, Xu LanPing, Huang XiaoJun, Jiang Qian
Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.
Peking Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 31;8(62):105397-105406. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22207. eCollection 2017 Dec 1.
Patients with standard-risk adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with chemotherapy do not have satisfactory outcomes. To more precisely classify ALL patients and optimize treatment, we re-evaluated the risk stratification system by examining CD20 expression and other classic risk factors at diagnosis. We retrospectively analyzed response to induction chemotherapy of 217 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative B cell precursor-ALL. Survival analyses were conducted for the 136 patients who were intended to be treated with chemotherapy alone. Among the 217 patients, 69 (31.8%) were considered standard risk based on age <35 years, white blood cell count <30 × 10/L, absence of central nervous system involvement, and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Seventy-four patients (34.1%) expressed CD20 on ≥20% of leukemia blasts and were considered CD20 positive. We found that fewer CD20-positive than CD20-negative patients achieved durable first complete responses (CR1 ≥3 months) (81.1% vs. 94.9%, P=0.002). Within the standard-risk group, more CD20-negative than CD20-positive patients achieved CR (100% vs. 83.3%, P=0.003) and durable CR1 (100% vs. 82.4%, P=0.014). For patients in the CD20-negative standard-risk, CD20-positive standard-risk, CD20-negative high-risk, and CD20-positive high-risk groups, the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 42.6%, 70.0%, 59.3%, and 69.5%, respectively (P=0.118); the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 52.1%, 0%, 20.7%, and 13.7%, respectively (P=0.006); and the 3-year overall survival rates were 55.8%, 13.8%, 23.6%, and 16.9%, respectively (P=0.006). Our results suggest that patients with CD20-negative standard-risk B cell precursor-ALL have favorable prognosis compared with CD20-positive standard-risk or CD20-negative or -positive high-risk patients. CD20-positive standard-risk ALL patients may need other therapeutic modalities bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
接受化疗的标准风险成年急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者预后并不理想。为了更精确地对ALL患者进行分类并优化治疗,我们通过在诊断时检测CD20表达及其他经典风险因素,重新评估了风险分层系统。我们回顾性分析了217例新诊断的费城染色体阴性B细胞前体ALL连续患者诱导化疗的反应。对136例拟单纯接受化疗的患者进行了生存分析。在这217例患者中,69例(31.8%)基于年龄<35岁、白细胞计数<30×10⁹/L、无中枢神经系统受累及无高危细胞遗传学异常被认为是标准风险。74例患者(34.1%)白血病原始细胞≥20%表达CD20,被认为是CD20阳性。我们发现,达到持久首次完全缓解(CR1≥3个月)的CD20阳性患者少于CD20阴性患者(81.1%对94.9%,P=0.002)。在标准风险组中,达到CR的CD20阴性患者多于CD20阳性患者(100%对83.3%,P=0.003),达到持久CR1的也是如此(100%对82.4%,P=0.014)。对于CD20阴性标准风险、CD20阳性标准风险、CD20阴性高危和CD20阳性高危组的患者,3年累积复发率分别为42.6%、70.0%、59.3%和69.5%(P=0.118);3年无病生存率分别为52.1%、0%、20.7%和13.7%(P=0.006);3年总生存率分别为55.8%、13.8%、23.6%和16.9%(P=0.006)。我们的结果表明,与CD20阳性标准风险或CD20阴性或阳性高危患者相比,CD20阴性标准风险B细胞前体ALL患者预后良好。CD20阳性标准风险ALL患者可能需要其他治疗方式以过渡到异基因造血干细胞移植。