Lazarev Ivan E, Sayfulina Ksenia E, Chernysheva Elena G, Bryzgalov Dmitri V, Chernyshev Boris V
School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
SSC RF Institute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Neuroreport. 2018 Mar 7;29(4):308-313. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000960.
Currently, there are two opposing views on feature binding in the auditory modality: according to behavioral studies, this process requires focused attention, whereas electrophysiological studies suggest that feature binding may be fully automatic and independent of attention. Here, we examined whether feature binding depends on higher-level attentional processes by manipulating the attentional focus. We used four auditory stimuli that differed in two features: pitch and location. Two rare deviants could be detected within a sequence of two frequent standards exclusively by feature conjunctions rather than by any single feature alone. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli were analyzed for four conditions: selective attention to target auditory deviants, selective ignoring of nontarget auditory deviants, nonselective distributed attention to all stimuli within auditory modality, and selective attention diverted from auditory to visual modality. The negative difference (Nd) between event-related potentials to deviants and standards was measured within two time intervals, corresponding to mismatch negativity (100-200 ms) and N2b (200-300 ms). Only under the condition of selective attention to specific feature conjunctions, prominent Nd was observed in mismatch negativity as well in N2b time ranges, whereas no significant Nd was observed in other conditions. As Nd is considered a marker of deviance processing, our results support the view that deviance was not detected unless attention was focused on the stimuli, thus supporting the view that feature binding requires attention.
目前,在听觉模态中的特征绑定问题上存在两种对立观点:行为研究表明,这一过程需要集中注意力,而电生理学研究则表明,特征绑定可能是完全自动的,且与注意力无关。在此,我们通过操纵注意力焦点来研究特征绑定是否依赖于更高层次的注意力过程。我们使用了四种在音高和位置这两个特征上有所不同的听觉刺激。在两个频繁出现的标准刺激序列中,只有通过特征联结而非任何单一特征,才能检测到两个罕见的偏差刺激。针对四种情况分析了听觉刺激的事件相关电位:选择性关注目标听觉偏差刺激、选择性忽略非目标听觉偏差刺激、对听觉模态内的所有刺激进行非选择性分散注意力,以及将选择性注意力从听觉转移到视觉模态。在两个时间间隔内测量了偏差刺激与标准刺激的事件相关电位的负向差异(Nd),这两个时间间隔分别对应失配负波(100 - 200毫秒)和N2b(200 - 300毫秒)。只有在选择性关注特定特征联结的条件下,在失配负波以及N2b时间范围内才观察到显著的Nd,而在其他条件下未观察到显著的Nd。由于Nd被认为是偏差处理的一个指标,我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即除非注意力集中在刺激上,否则无法检测到偏差,从而支持了特征绑定需要注意力的观点。