Suppr超能文献

对精神障碍患者中一份德语版的饮食健康强迫症症状简易诊断问卷(Ortho-10)的评估。

Evaluation of a German version of a brief diagnosis questionnaire of symptoms of orthorexia nervosa in patients with mental disorders (Ortho-10).

作者信息

Andreas Sylke, Schedler Kirsten, Schulz Holger, Nutzinger Detlev O

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Universitätsstr. 65-67, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria.

Department of Medical Psychology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2018 Feb;23(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s40519-017-0473-y. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In recent years, a new term-orthorexia nervosa (ON)-has been introduced in the field of clinical assessment and psychotherapy. Orthorexia nervosa is defined as a fixation on healthy food and a pathological obsession to eat food with more natural, higher quality ingredients. Although instruments to measure ON are available, no study on the psychometric properties of the original developed instrument by Bratman (Orthorexia nervosa: Overcoming the obsession with healthful eating, Broadway Books, New York, 2000) in a large clinical sample exists until now.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a large clinic in Germany. The study sample consisted of N = 1122 inpatients, 70% were female, and the mean age was 41 years (SD = 14 years). The main diagnoses at the end of treatment were affective disorders (46%), followed by eating disorders (13%), anxiety disorders (10%), and personality disorders (10%). The patients filled out several instruments, like the Ortho-10, the 10-item version of the orthorexia nervosa instrument, and other construct-related, disorder-specific and construct-distant instruments.

RESULTS

The exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure: an eating disorder-specific factor and an orthorexia-nervosa specific factor. The eating disorder factor showed good convergent and discriminative validity in which patients with eating disorders and those without could correctly be classified. However, the orthorexia-nervosa specific factor revealed no informational gain compared to the eating disorder-specific factor in this clinical sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation is necessary to approach the concept of ON and its sense in clinical samples.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II: evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization.

摘要

目的

近年来,临床评估和心理治疗领域引入了一个新术语——神经性正食症(ON)。神经性正食症被定义为对健康食品的执着以及对食用含有更天然、更高质量成分食物的病态痴迷。尽管有测量神经性正食症的工具,但迄今为止,尚未有关于布拉特曼最初开发的工具(《神经性正食症:克服对健康饮食的痴迷》,百老汇图书公司,纽约,2000年)在大型临床样本中的心理测量特性的研究。

方法

该研究在德国的一家大型诊所进行。研究样本包括N = 1122名住院患者,其中70%为女性,平均年龄为41岁(标准差 = 14岁)。治疗结束时的主要诊断为情感障碍(46%),其次是饮食失调(13%)、焦虑症(10%)和人格障碍(10%)。患者填写了几份问卷,如Ortho - 10(神经性正食症问卷的10项版本)以及其他与结构相关、特定疾病和结构无关的问卷。

结果

探索性因素分析揭示了一个双因素结构:一个饮食失调特定因素和一个神经性正食症特定因素。饮食失调因素显示出良好的收敛效度和区分效度,能够正确区分饮食失调患者和非饮食失调患者。然而,在这个临床样本中,与饮食失调特定因素相比,神经性正食症特定因素并未显示出更多信息。

结论

有必要进一步研究神经性正食症的概念及其在临床样本中的意义。

证据水平

二级:从设计良好的非随机对照试验中获得的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验