University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Switzerland.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):NP135-NP161. doi: 10.1177/0886260517732345. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Older persons' perspectives regarding elder abuse remain little studied. However, definitions of elder abuse and effective prevention strategies require adaptation to the needs and cultures of targeted populations. This study explored the views of older persons and professionals to evaluate their converging and diverging perspectives toward elder abuse and its prevention. The study employed a qualitative approach where six focus groups were held in Western Switzerland (the French-speaking part of the country). Four focus groups with 25 older persons from varying socioeconomic backgrounds, and the other two focus groups were carried out with 16 professionals working in the field of elder abuse prevention. For the focus groups, we used the technique of free associations to begin the discussions and vignette-like statements to explore participants' attitudes toward elder abuse. These were followed by open-ended questions. The transcripts from the focus groups were analyzed thematically and resulted in four main themes: (a) varied associations of the term "abuse," (b) judging elder abuse situations in terms of abuse and severity, (c) self-identification with elder abuse, and (d) prevention of elder abuse. Study findings demonstrated that older persons hold views that are partly different from the views of professionals. Furthermore, perceptions of older persons could be stratified based on the socioeconomic status of the participants. These diverging perspectives reflect the heterogeneity of the senior citizen population and highlight the need for research cognizant of these differences. The results of this study provide strategies for improved targeting of preventive measures, underline the importance of integrating the perspectives of older persons, and reveal the need to expand the commonly accepted definitions of elder abuse so that they better reflect the affected individuals.
老年人对虐待老年人问题的看法仍然很少受到研究。然而,虐待老年人的定义和有效的预防策略需要根据目标人群的需求和文化进行调整。本研究探讨了老年人和专业人员的观点,以评估他们对虐待老年人及其预防的趋同和分歧观点。该研究采用定性方法,在瑞士西部(该国的法语区)进行了六次焦点小组讨论。四个焦点小组有 25 名来自不同社会经济背景的老年人,另外两个焦点小组是与从事预防虐待老年人工作的 16 名专业人员进行的。对于焦点小组,我们使用自由联想技术开始讨论,并使用类似小插曲的陈述来探讨参与者对虐待老年人的态度。然后提出了一些开放式问题。对焦点小组的记录进行了主题分析,得出了四个主要主题:(a)“虐待”一词的不同联想,(b)根据虐待和严重程度判断虐待老年人的情况,(c)自我认同为虐待老年人,以及(d)预防虐待老年人。研究结果表明,老年人的观点与专业人员的观点部分不同。此外,老年人的看法可以根据参与者的社会经济地位进行分层。这些不同的观点反映了老年人群体的异质性,并强调需要进行研究,以了解这些差异。本研究的结果为改进预防措施的针对性提供了策略,强调了纳入老年人观点的重要性,并揭示了需要扩大普遍接受的虐待老年人定义,以更好地反映受影响的个人。