Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University and Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(6):1169-1181. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2016.163. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data on dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) as a mobilization regimen, compared to high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC), for up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is limited.
Consecutive patients with aggressive NHL treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or rituximab-CHOP who underwent chemomobilization using HDC or DHAP plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for up-front ASCT were enrolled from three institutions between 2004 and 2014.
Ninety-six patients (57 men) were included. Sixty-five patients (67.7%) received HDC; and 31 (32.3%), DHAP. The total CD34+ cells mobilized were significantly higher in patients receiving DHAP (16.1 vs. 6.1 × 106/kg, p = 0.001). More patients achieved successful mobilization with DHAP (CD34+ cells ≥ 5.0 × 106/kg) compared to HDC (87.1% vs. 61.5%, respectively; p = 0.011), particularly within the first two sessions of apheresis (64.5% vs. 32.3%, respectively; p = 0.003). Mobilization failure rate (CD34+ cells < 2.0 × 106/kg) was significantly higher in patients receiving HDC (20.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, the DHAP regimen (odds ratio, 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 15.17) was an independent predictor of successful mobilization. During chemomobilization, patients receiving HDC experienced more episodes of febrile neutropenia compared to patients receiving DHAP (32.3% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.043).
The DHAP regimen was associated with a significantly higher efficacy for stem cell mobilization and lower frequency of febrile neutropenia. Therefore, DHAP plus G-CSF is an effective for mobilization in patients with aggressive NHL who were candidates for up-front ASCT.
背景/目的:与大剂量环磷酰胺(HDC)相比,地塞米松、阿糖胞苷和顺铂(DHAP)作为动员方案用于非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的一线自体干细胞移植(ASCT)的数据有限。
连续纳入 2004 年至 2014 年期间在三个机构接受环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)或利妥昔单抗-CHOP 治疗且接受 HDC 或 DHAP 加粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行一线 ASCT 的侵袭性 NHL 患者。
共纳入 96 例患者(57 例男性)。65 例(67.7%)患者接受 HDC;31 例(32.3%)接受 DHAP。接受 DHAP 的患者总 CD34+细胞动员量明显高于接受 HDC 的患者(16.1 vs. 6.1×106/kg,p=0.001)。与 HDC 相比,接受 DHAP 的患者有更多患者成功动员(CD34+细胞≥5.0×106/kg)(分别为 87.1%和 61.5%,p=0.011),特别是在前两次采集过程中(分别为 64.5%和 32.3%,p=0.003)。接受 HDC 的患者动员失败率(CD34+细胞<2.0×106/kg)明显高于接受 HDC 的患者(20.0%和 3.2%,p=0.032)。多变量分析显示,DHAP 方案(比值比,4.12;95%置信区间,1.12 至 15.17)是成功动员的独立预测因子。在化疗动员期间,接受 HDC 的患者与接受 DHAP 的患者相比,中性粒细胞减少性发热的发生率更高(32.3%和 12.9%,p=0.043)。
DHAP 方案与更高的干细胞动员疗效和更低的中性粒细胞减少性发热发生率相关。因此,DHAP 加 G-CSF 是侵袭性 NHL 患者一线 ASCT 候选者动员的有效方法。