Bracamonte José L, Devick Ian, Thomas Keri L, Hendrick Steven
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4.
Can Vet J. 2018 Jan;59(1):67-73.
The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of hand-sewn jejunojejunal anastomoses to those of oversewn stapled jejunojejunal anastomoses. Jejunojejunal anastomoses were constructed from harvested jejunal segments using a single-layer Lembert technique (1HS), double-layer simple continuous/Cushing technique (2HS), stapled side-to-side technique oversewn with Cushing pattern (SS), and closed 1-stage stapled functional end-to-end technique oversewn with Cushing pattern (FEE). Anastomosed segments were distended with fluid until the point of biomechanical failure. The 2HS had the longest construction time of all anastomoses. Bursting pressures were significantly higher for hand-sewn jejunojejunostomies than those for oversewn stapled jejunojejunostomies. No significant differences were found in bursting pressures between 1HS and 2HS or between SS and FEE. Hand-sewn jejunojejunostomies proved to be biomechanically stronger than oversewn stapled jejunojejunostomies when initially constructed. However, all anastomotic types would be secure techniques to be used clinically based on the supraphysiological pressures they are capable of withstanding.
本研究的目的是比较手工缝合空肠空肠吻合术与缝合加固的吻合器空肠空肠吻合术的生物力学特性。使用单层伦伯特技术(1HS)、双层单纯连续/库欣技术(2HS)、用库欣缝合法缝合加固的侧侧吻合器技术(SS)以及用库欣缝合法缝合加固的闭合式一期功能性端端吻合器技术(FEE),从获取的空肠段构建空肠空肠吻合术。用液体使吻合段扩张,直至达到生物力学失效点。2HS在所有吻合术中构建时间最长。手工缝合的空肠空肠吻合术的破裂压力显著高于缝合加固的吻合器空肠空肠吻合术。1HS与2HS之间或SS与FEE之间的破裂压力未发现显著差异。最初构建时,手工缝合的空肠空肠吻合术在生物力学上比缝合加固的吻合器空肠空肠吻合术更强。然而,基于它们能够承受的超生理压力,所有吻合类型在临床上都是安全可用的技术。