de Vries Rob, Reininga Inge H F, Pieske Oliver, Lefering Rolf, El Moumni Mostafa, Wendt Klaus
Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emergency Care Network Northern Netherlands (AZNN), Northern Netherlands Trauma Registry, Groningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190587. eCollection 2018.
Polytrauma patients nowadays tend to be older due to the growth of the elderly population and its improved mobility. The aim of this study was to compare demographics, injury patterns, injury mechanisms and outcomes between younger and older polytrauma patients.
Data from polytrauma (ISS≥16) patients between 2009 and 2014 were extracted from the Dutch trauma registry (DTR). Younger (Group A: ages 18-59) and older (Group B: ages ≥60) polytrauma patients were compared. Differences in injury severity, trauma mechanism (only data for the year 2014), vital signs, injury patterns, ICU characteristics and hospital mortality were analyzed.
Data of 25,304 polytrauma patients were analyzed. The older patients represented 47.8% of the polytrauma population. Trauma mechanism in the older patients was more likely to be a bicycle accident (A: 17%; B: 21%) or a low-energy fall (A: 13%; B: 43%). Younger polytrauma patients were more likely to have the worst scores on the Glasgow coma scale (EMV = 3, A: 20%, B: 13%). However, serious head injuries were seen more often in the older patients (A: 53%; B: 69%). The hospital mortality was doubled for the older polytrauma patients (19.8% vs. 9.6%).
Elderly are involved more often in polytrauma. Although injury severity did not differ between groups, the older polytrauma patients were at a higher risk of dying than their younger counterparts despite sustaining less high-energy accidents.
由于老年人口的增长及其行动能力的改善,如今多发伤患者的年龄趋于更大。本研究的目的是比较年轻和老年多发伤患者的人口统计学特征、损伤类型、损伤机制及预后。
从荷兰创伤登记处(DTR)提取2009年至2014年间多发伤(损伤严重度评分[ISS]≥16)患者的数据。比较年轻(A组:18 - 59岁)和老年(B组:≥60岁)多发伤患者。分析损伤严重程度、创伤机制(仅2014年数据)、生命体征、损伤类型、重症监护病房特征及医院死亡率的差异。
分析了25304例多发伤患者的数据。老年患者占多发伤人群的47.8%。老年患者的创伤机制更可能是自行车事故(A组:17%;B组:21%)或低能量跌倒(A组:13%;B组:43%)。年轻多发伤患者更可能在格拉斯哥昏迷量表上得分最差(急诊室平均评分[EMV]=3,A组:20%,B组:13%)。然而,老年患者中严重颅脑损伤更为常见(A组:53%;B组:69%)。老年多发伤患者的医院死亡率增加了一倍(19.8%对9.6%)。
老年人更多地涉及多发伤。尽管两组间损伤严重程度无差异,但老年多发伤患者尽管遭受的高能量事故较少,但其死亡风险高于年轻患者。