Suppr超能文献

升主动脉扩张:马凡综合征患者比马凡样特征患者预后更差吗?

Aortic Root Dilation: Do Patients With Marfan Syndrome Fare Worse Than Those With Marfanoid Features?

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Feb;93(2):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.018. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discover whether patients with aortic root dilation and leptosomic features but without a diagnosis of Marfan syndrome (MFS) fare similarly to patients with MFS.

METHODS

Of 124 patients with aortic root dilation identified from August 1, 1994, through October 31, 2012, 66 had MFS and 58 had leptosomic features but did not meet the Ghent criteria. Genetic testing was performed in 35% of patients (n=43). We compared z scores and aortic root diameters for patients who presented with aortic root dilation with and without an MFS diagnosis and with and without aortic root repair.

RESULTS

No difference existed in initial aortic root diameters between groups (P=.15); however, mean ± SD z scores for patients without MFS and with MFS were 3.1±2.3 vs 4.5±3.2 (P=.005). Fourteen of 58 patients (24%) without MFS and 35 (53%) with MFS underwent aortic root operations (P<.05). For both groups who did not have surgery, aortic root diameters and z scores remained similar at follow-up (P=.20), as did 10-year survival: MFS, 100%; no MFS, 94.1% (P=.98). No significant difference was found for mean ± SD root diameter (no MFS, 38.9±7.3 mm; MFS, 35±8.6 mm; P=.06) or z score (no MFS, 2.4±2.0; MFS, 2.1±2.0; P=.53) for patients who underwent surgery. Two patients in each group had aortic root dissections.

CONCLUSION

Similar rates of aortic dissection between the 2 groups warrant further study regarding patients with leptosomic features but no diagnosis of MFS. Aortic root dilation progressed similarly in patients who did not undergo surgery.

摘要

目的

探究是否患有升主动脉扩张且体型瘦长但未被诊断为马凡综合征(MFS)的患者与 MFS 患者预后相似。

方法

1994 年 8 月 1 日至 2012 年 10 月 31 日期间,我们从确诊为升主动脉扩张的 124 名患者中选取了 66 名 MFS 患者和 58 名体型瘦长但不符合根 Ghent 标准的患者。对 35%的患者(n=43)进行了基因检测。我们比较了主动脉根部扩张伴或不伴 MFS 诊断以及伴或不伴主动脉根部修复的患者的 z 评分和主动脉根部直径。

结果

各组患者初始主动脉根部直径无差异(P=.15);然而,无 MFS 患者和有 MFS 患者的平均 z 评分分别为 3.1±2.3 与 4.5±3.2(P=.005)。58 名无 MFS 患者中有 14 名(24%)和 35 名(53%)有 MFS 的患者进行了主动脉根部手术(P<.05)。对于两组未进行手术的患者,主动脉根部直径和 z 评分在随访时仍相似(P=.20),10 年生存率也相似:MFS 组为 100%,无 MFS 组为 94.1%(P=.98)。手术患者的平均主动脉根部直径(无 MFS,38.9±7.3 mm;MFS,35±8.6 mm;P=.06)或 z 评分(无 MFS,2.4±2.0;MFS,2.1±2.0;P=.53)无显著差异。两组各有 2 例患者发生主动脉夹层。

结论

两组患者的主动脉夹层发生率相似,这表明对于患有体型瘦长但未被诊断为 MFS 的患者需要进一步研究。未进行手术的患者主动脉根部扩张进展相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验