Leonard Susan Hautaniemi, Robinson Christopher, Anderton Douglas L
University of Michigan.
University of South Carolina.
Soc Sci Hist. 2017 Winter;41(4):645-671. doi: 10.1017/ssh.2017.26. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
This paper explores the social interactions of immigration, occupation and wealth in two urban industrial cities of nineteenth century New England that were largely built upon, and shaped by, immigration: the very rapidly growing factory town of Holyoke, Massachusetts and a more mixed market and steadily growing nearby community of Northampton, Massachusetts. Both communities were emergent, rapidly industrializing, inland cities, providing a quite distinct immigration context than large established cities of the East Coast. Both were destinations for the same general ethnic immigration waves over the late nineteenth century, but with very different, and differently impacted, social spaces into which immigrants arrived. Contrasting and considering both these emergent cities allows us to ascertain the extent to which the occupational distribution and accumulation of wealth by immigrant groups supports the broad pattern of nineteenth-century assimilation, and reveals ways in which other migration processes may have been at odds, or intertwined, with the long-term historical assimilation of immigrants in such communities. Our findings support a traditional assimilationist perspective in emergent urban-industrial centers. However, they also reveal the role of universal immiseration in an industrial city dual-labor market in facilitating or forcing assimilation, the temporal advantages for ethnic groups of arriving early in growing settlements, and the more individualistic nature of economic enclaves in gaining advantages over time that did not manifest across broad immigrant or occupational groups.
本文探讨了19世纪新英格兰地区两个城市工业城市中移民、职业和财富的社会互动情况。这两个城市在很大程度上是基于移民建立起来并由移民塑造的:马萨诸塞州发展迅速的工厂城镇霍利奥克,以及马萨诸塞州北安普敦附近一个市场更为多元化且稳步发展的社区。这两个社区都是新兴的、快速工业化的内陆城市,与东海岸的大型老牌城市相比,提供了截然不同的移民背景。在19世纪后期,这两个社区都是同一批主要族裔移民浪潮的目的地,但移民进入的社会空间却截然不同,受到的影响也不同。对这两个新兴城市进行对比和考量,使我们能够确定移民群体的职业分布和财富积累在多大程度上支持了19世纪同化的总体模式,并揭示了其他移民过程可能与这些社区中移民的长期历史同化产生冲突或相互交织的方式。我们的研究结果支持了新兴城市工业中心的传统同化主义观点。然而,它们也揭示了普遍贫困在工业城市二元劳动力市场中促进或迫使同化的作用、族裔群体在新兴定居点早期到达所具有的时间优势,以及经济飞地随着时间推移获得优势的更具个人主义性质,而这种优势并未在广泛的移民群体或职业群体中体现出来。